Law Student Report 2011
Capturing the views of over 3,000 law undergraduates from the UK's top universities (Russell Group) as well as Graduate Diploma in Law (GDL) students from the College of Law, BPP Law School and Kaplan Law School, this report identifies the reasons why students choose law as a career and how their views of law firms develop throughout their studies. This report looks at the career options considered by students, what attracts them to law and the most powerful influences on their choice of firm. The report reveals which forms of marketing have the most impact and which firms students believe are the most prestigious, the best for training contracts and best for a healthy work/life balance.
February 15, 2010 at 11:35 AM
4 minute read
Capturing the views of over 3,000 law undergraduates from the UK's top universities (Russell Group) as well as Graduate Diploma in Law (GDL) students from the College of Law, BPP Law School and Kaplan Law School, this report identifies the reasons why students choose law as a career and how their views of law firms develop throughout their studies. This report looks at the career options considered by students, what attracts them to law and the most powerful influences on their choice of firm. The report reveals which forms of marketing have the most impact and which firms students believe are the most prestigious, the best for training contracts and best for a healthy work/life balance.
The study
Now in its fifth year, this report canvasses the views of law students at the leading universities and largest GDL providers in the UK. Respondents are asked a series of questions to establish their professional ambitions, their views of the courses and faculties, their exposure to legal marketing and their resulting perceptions of law firms.
Content
The first half of the report examines why students have chosen a career in law. It then looks at their sources of information and the importance they attach to each one. In the second half, international, national and City law firms are assessed across five different performance criteria:
Prestige
- which firms have the most sticking power in terms of brand recognition?
Best training programme
- which firms have communicated the strength of their programmes to the students and the law schools' careers offices?
Work/life balance
- which firms will allow graduates to have a life outside the office and which are regarded as 'sweatshops'?
Best career options
- which firms are the best for starting out with, in terms of students' CVs?
Best for equal opportunities
- which firms actively promote the role of women internally and in the profession?
- We use the results to create benchmarking tables of all 60 firms covered in the report.
- These will be broken down into International, National and City firms.
- The tables will specify your scores for each of the performance criteria as well as the results of the other 59 firms.
- The overall rankings are broken down by reference to year of study, type of institution, gender and ethnic grouping, but also by motivation and career ambition.
Research methodology
|- In 2010, the survey received over 3,000 replies from law students at Russell Group universities and GDL students from the College of Law, BPP Law School and Kaplan Law School.
- Law faculty department heads and career advisory bodies at each institution disseminate a link to an nonline survey.
- Law students are also contacted by telephone to answer more specific questions on behalf of individual law firms.
Standard package
|- As part of the standard package, you'll receive:
- A hard copy of the report, a PDF copy for internal distribution, plus all the charts and tables in Excel
- A management presentation of the results from our director of research. This can be to your firm's board or the graduate recruitment/HR team, or both. The presentation will drill down from the general findings to a firm's specific scores, especially in the context of a hand-picked peer group.
- Participating law firms that perform best in their category (international, national and City) are awarded an accreditation as Best Graduate Employer 2011
Additional services for 2011
|- This year, in response to client feedback, we're offering a number of additional services:
- Firms have the opportunity to ask respondents firm-specific questions, giving them the opportunity to probe branding and reputational issues in more detail.
- There are new questions this year on firm-specific Legal Practice Courses and redundancy programmes. Law firms can gauge the effect of publicity on their reputation among the country's best legal schools.
- The best-performing firms will be highlighted in Legal Week, on legalweek.com and in Legal Week's student supplement.
For more details, contact Paul Birk on 0207 316 9864 or email [email protected].
|
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWickard AI Partners With Law School to Bring Legal AI Training to Ethiopia
What Firms in Australia Are Doing to Attract and Retain Lawyers in a Competitive Market
7 minute readReport: Toronto Law Students Did Not Breach School's Code of Conduct With Pro-Palestinian Letter
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250