Freshfields' pay round: market-leading again in many senses
Well, the 2010 pay round for City assistants has largely already been set, and we didn't even make it out of February. That is because Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer - having quite rightly led the market in early 2009 by halting its assistant lockstep - last week decided to restart the track. And it will be very surprising if this policy is not widely adopted by rivals in the spring when most firms get around making a decision on assistant pay.
March 01, 2010 at 08:18 AM
3 minute read
Well, the 2010 pay round for City assistants has largely already been set, and we didn't even make it out of February. That is because Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer – having quite rightly led the market in early 2009 by halting its assistant lockstep – last week decided to restart the track. And it will be very surprising if this policy is not widely adopted by rivals in the spring when most firms get around making a decision on assistant pay.
Of course, even restarting the track means Freshfields has effectively taken a step out of the ladder, ushering in a lower entry level salary of £59,000, against its pre-recession rate of £66,000.
This resets the market to a substantial degree, returning remuneration for City assistants to 2006 levels, or arguably more like 2000 in real terms once you account for inflation.
That decision had not come without its cost. Last year's move went down like a lead balloon with a gas bill attached to it among Freshfields assistants, even though the firm was rare among large City practices in not making formal redundancies in any serious numbers. Nor was the firm's policy of running a drum-tight leverage popular, as it meant that assistants in many practice areas were still putting in heavy hours despite the gloomy state of the market.
This resentment was fuelled further by the fact that a strong first-half performance in 2008-09 meant that Freshfields maintained profitability and top-line performance even as it opted for a full pay freeze for assistants. But the reality was that activity levels had sharply dropped by early 2009 and the outlook back then indicated clearly that the market would not be recovering any time soon, added to which there was pressure from clients for a symbolic move to control lawyer salaries.
That equation will now reverse as Freshfields restarts the associate track in a year in which its revenues and partner profits are expected to see significant declines. While visibility remains limited, current estimates are that fee income could be down as much as 10% against last year, when the firm posted total revenues of £1.287bn. That should go a fair way towards improving the mood internally.
And for Freshfields the fundamentals of its business look very solid. The firm has slashed its cost base without resorting to heavy job cuts. In addition, its partnership has continued to be cohesive, proactive and effective at bringing in what business there is out there. The firm has had its share of luck – getting its partnership restructuring out of the way during the boom was perhaps fortunate – but Freshfields has looked tightly managed and purposeful as well.
This latest decision is another example of that pragmatism. Despite a few bumps and scraps, Freshfields is one of a handful of major law firms looking set to exit the recession in a stronger position than it went in.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham's magic circle strikes, pay rises and EY's legal takeover: the best of Legal Week over the last few weeks
3 minute readJob losses, soaring partner profits and Freshfields exits - the best of Legal Week over the past two weeks
3 minute readMagic circle PEP hikes, the associate pay conundrum and more #MeToo - the best of Legal Week last week
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Legaltech Rundown: Alexi Launches an AI Litigation Tool, Hotshot Announces Private Equity Practice Courses, and More
- 26-48. It’s Comp Time Again: How To Crush Your Comp Memo
- 3'Religious Discrimination'?: 4th Circuit Revives Challenge to Employer Vaccine Mandate
- 4Fight Over Amicus-Funding Disclosure Surfaces in Google Play Appeal
- 5The Power of Student Prior Knowledge in Legal Education
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250