Trainee retention at UK top 30 falls below 80%
Trainee retention rates across the UK's top 30 law firms have been hit by the ongoing economic downturn, with most firms with March 2010 intakes retaining under 80% of their newly-qualified lawyers. Legal Week research shows the average retention rate for March 2010 stood at 75%, comparing acceptances with the number of qualifiers, a drop of nearly 10% on the 83% retention rate reported in March 2009.
March 10, 2010 at 07:04 PM
3 minute read
Retention rate falls 8% on 2009; Simmons records 69% rate
Trainee retention rates across the UK's top 30 law firms have been hit by the ongoing economic downturn, with most firms with March 2010 intakes retaining under 80% of their newly-qualified lawyers.
Legal Week research shows the average retention rate for March 2010 stood at 75%, comparing acceptances with the number of qualifiers, a drop of nearly 10% on the 83% retention rate reported in March 2009.
The figure, which is based on final numbers from the 21 top 30 firms operating both March and September trainee intakes, rises to 79% when looking at the number of accepted places compared with the number of lawyers applying to be kept on.
Figures were broadly similar across leading City firms and national players, with the top 10 City firms seeing a final average retention rate of 75%, with 306 of 407 lawyers qualifying accepting places with the firms.
At the five national law firms with a March 2010 intake, retention stood at 76% on average – the same as in March 2009.
Simmons & Simmons bucked the trend for declining retention after keeping on 69% of its March 2010 qualifiers compared with 53% of its March 2009 intake. However, both figures are well below its peer-group average.
Pinsent Masons also came in below average, keeping on nine of its 14 March 2010 qualifiers, giving it a retention rate of 64%. This rises to 82% considering only the 11 applying for positions.
Nabarro and Wragge & Co saw the highest retention rates across the top 30 for March 2010 at 86%. Other firms within the top 30 with new retention figures include Addleshaw Goddard, which is keeping on 89% of its March 2010 intake and 100% of those applying, and Macfarlanes, which is retaining 67% of the intake.
Linklaters, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Clifford Chance (CC) all saw retention dip between March 2009 and 2010, with final retention figures standing at 73% at Linklaters, 80% at Freshfields and 70% at CC. Allen & Overy dipped from 89% to 83%
Linklaters trainee development partner Simon Firth told Legal Week: "The results are due to the economic downturn. The attrition rate has gone down and we have to align our recruitment numbers against our forecast of the number of people who we predict will leave each year, which is less than normal."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBird & Bird Steers Katjes in Bittersweet Dispute with Lindt & Nestlé Over Vegan Chocolate Patent
Hong Kong Bourse Seeks Feedback on IPO Price Discovery, Takes Steps to Boost Capital Markets Activity
Big Four Japanese Firm Mori Hamada Launches Foreign Joint Law Enterprise, Joins Rebrand Drive
US Wins Trade Dispute with Mexico Over Genetically Modified Corn
Trending Stories
- 1SEC’s Latest Enforcement Actions Fuel Demand for Big Law
- 2Sterlington Brings On Former Office Leader From Ashurst
- 3DOJ Takes on Largest NFT Scheme That Points to Larger Trend
- 4Arnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
- 5Advising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250