FSA secures trophy conviction of ex-Cazenove partner
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has secured its most significant conviction to date with former Cazenove partner Malcolm Calvert this week being convicted on five counts of insider dealing. The verdict yesterday (10 March) represented the FSA's most high-profile conviction and the third successful prosecution for insider dealing by the City regulator, which hailed the result as a "milestone".
March 11, 2010 at 10:12 AM
3 minute read
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has secured its most significant conviction to date with former Cazenove partner Malcolm Calvert this week being convicted on five counts of insider dealing.
The verdict yesterday (10 March) represented the FSA's most high-profile conviction and the third successful prosecution for insider dealing by the City regulator, which hailed the result as a "milestone".
The former market-maker and stockbroker, who was a partner at Cazenove until he retired in 2000, made around £103,800 from illicit trades between June 2003 and October 2004. Calvert was today (11 March) sentenced to 21 months in jail.
The jury at Southwark Crown Court took three days to find the 65-year-old guilty on five out of 12 counts of insider trading based on trades in three companies: biotech firm Vernalis, engineering company Johnston Group and water supplier South Staffordshire. Calvert used inside information to invest more than £500,000 with a friend in the three companies, which were the subject of non-public takeover bids.
Red Lion Court silk Peter Carter was lead prosecution counsel with Hugo Keith QC of Three Raymond Buildings defending.
A breakthrough came for the FSA through the use of an informant, who agreed to provide evidence against Calvert in return for leniency, a move viewed by lawyers as an adoption of US-style enforcement tactics. The co-conspirator, Bertie Hatcher, was fined £56,098 as part of his settlement with the FSA rather than face criminal charges.
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer financial services litigation partner Simon Orton told Legal Week: "It is plainly an important result for the FSA – it is an example of them taking on a harder case and managing to secure a conviction, and it is important to show that they are willing to take risks to get their message across."
Berwin Leighton Paisner financial services partner Nathan Willmott said: "The fact that [the FSA] secured co-operation from an insider in exchange for immunity was key to securing a conviction in this case. The FSA's aim in granting immunity to witnesses is to begin to secure guilty pleas at an early stage without the need to adduce evidence on how the inside information was passed on, and this conviction will certainly have helped achieve this.
"Obviously if they can begin to get defendants to plead guilty then they can get through a larger number of cases and avoid the risks that are inherent in jury trials."
The FSA has in recent months moved to take a tougher stance in cases of suspected market abuse as it moves to head off criticism that it has failed to regulate the City effectively. FSA research found suspicious trading preceded 29% of announced takeover deals in 2008, up from 24% in 2005.
Margaret Cole, director of enforcement and financial crime at the FSA, commented on the Calvert verdict: "The guilty verdict is a shot across the bow for any City workers who may be tempted to trade using insider knowledge. Our message is simple: if you take part in such activity, you run a very real risk of the FSA taking criminal action against you."
Last week the regulator confirmed that it was overhauling its policy on financial penalties, which is expected to dramatically increase the level of fines it hands out for serious regulatory breaches.
Click here for an interview with the FSA's Margaret Cole.
Click here for the latest legal developments in financial services regulation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBroadcom Hires From Nuclear Giant to Appoint French Legal Head
GCs Say They are Getting 'Edged Out' of UK Boardrooms
'I Won’t Name the Firm, But...'—Barratt Redrow's Legal Head on External Counsel Red Flags
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250