Eversheds mulls shares for fees as firms step up alternative billing
Eversheds is considering taking shares in client companies in exchange for fees as growing numbers of law firms look at more innovative pricing options including fee rebates. The top 10 UK firm is in the early stages of considering shares for fees - a practice that has not been commonly seen in the UK since the dotcom boom.
March 17, 2010 at 08:04 PM
3 minute read
Eversheds is considering taking shares in client companies in exchange for fees as growing numbers of law firms look at more innovative pricing options including fee rebates.
The top 10 UK firm is in the early stages of considering shares for fees – a practice that has not been commonly seen in the UK since the dotcom boom.
Eversheds' South African arm has already taken shares in around six listed companies as well as a limited number of unlisted clients and the firm is now keen to explore whether it could do the same in the UK.
Eversheds chief executive Bryan Hughes (pictured) said: "We have looked at it over the years and generally steered away from it, but there is more appetite for sharing risk and reward so we are looking at it again.
"However, at this moment the Alternative Investment Market is very quiet and therefore it isn't practically available."
The news comes as Herbert Smith confirmed that it had been approached by a number of clients in recent months asking whether it would consider a shares for fees arrangement. Although the firm did not proceed with this, partners said it would not rule it out in the future.
The re-emergence of the idea comes as increasing numbers of firms look at alternative billing options.
Slaughter and May has entered into rebate arrangements with clients, paying back a percentage of fees at the end of the year depending on how much has been spent. The arrangement has been in place with one client for several years and it expects to use it more frequently.
Other firms predicting an increase in rebates include Lovells, CMS Cameron McKenna, Norton Rose and Allen & Overy (A&O). Others, such as Norton Rose and Bird & Bird, are reporting increased use of success and abort fees in non-contentious areas.
Norton Rose group chairman Stephen Parish said: "Increasing numbers of banking clients want volume discounts. Rebates are not as prevalent at this stage but are increasingly expected."
A&O managing partner Wim Dejonghe said: "Clients, for obvious reasons, want more for less but they do understand that there needs to be a win-win situation for both sides. In terms of formats, anything is possible – we are really flexible."
Bird & Bird managing partner David Kerr said: "Alternative billing is definitely the future for what clients want. We have been developing all sorts of different and sophisticated packages from fixed fees to retainer arrangements to success fees in non-contentious work.
"We looked at taking shares out in clients during the dotcom period but concluded it is not something we would do as it is quite dangerous and risky. However, in principle, it is different if funds are established where partners could invest their own money into a client, which is something that we could look at in the future."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA&O Shearman, Hogan Lovells & 10 Top Stories That Shaped Africa in 2024
4 minute readBorden Ladner Gervais Cyber Expert Warns of Growing Threats From AI-Boosted Ransomware Attacks
3 minute readBaker & Partners, LCWP Lead on $1B Fraud Claim by Malaysia's 1MDB Against Amicorp
Trending Stories
- 1'Largest Retail Data Breach in History'? Hot Topic and Affiliated Brands Sued for Alleged Failure to Prevent Data Breach Linked to Snowflake Software
- 2Former President of New York State Bar, and the New York Bar Foundation, Dies As He Entered 70th Year as Attorney
- 3Legal Advocates in Uproar Upon Release of Footage Showing CO's Beat Black Inmate Before His Death
- 4Longtime Baker & Hostetler Partner, Former White House Counsel David Rivkin Dies at 68
- 5Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250