Shearman becomes latest firm to revamp pay for UK associates
Shearman & Sterling is to ditch associate lockstep for all of its lawyers in the UK, Asia and the Middle East in favour of a merit-based pay system. The new system, which will be effective from 1 May, will see all associates assessed twice a year against a number of criteria including client relationships, legal and technical capabilities and interpersonal skills.
March 18, 2010 at 12:06 PM
2 minute read
Shearman & Sterling is to ditch associate lockstep for all of its lawyers in the UK, Asia and the Middle East in favour of a merit-based pay system.
The new system, which will be effective from 1 May, will see all associates assessed twice a year against a number of criteria including client relationships, legal and technical capabilities and interpersonal skills.
Associates will be placed into one of three tiers, with each band having maximum and minimum base salaries, which are yet to be decided.
Lawyers will become eligible for promotion into the second tier after gaining 18 months' experience, while at least four and a half years' experience will be required before associates are considered for the third tier.
Shearman's US associates who are based in the firm's offices in the UK, Asia and the Middle East will not be affected by the changes.
Last year the US firm froze its associate lockstep, meaning lawyers with one year post-qualification experience (PQE) took home £80,000, while 2PQE associates earned £84,000 and 3PQEs £92,000.
Trainees who qualified in September 2009 receive £73,000 – a reduction of £7,000 on the previous salary for newly-qualified lawyers.
Firmwide HR director Marcus Franks commented: "Although the removal of associate lockstep pay is certainly becoming more prevalent, we firmly believe that our overall approach on career development is highly commercial, pragmatic and flexible."
The news comes as it has emerged that Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy has taken a similar measure in its London office, with the firm introducing a three-tier banding system in London that will run alongside its lockstep-based pay structure.
The new structure, introduced in January 2010, will only apply in the City, with the US firm's other offices maintaining pay based on post-qualification experience.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAshurst Beijing Chief Representative Leaves for New York Boutique Sterlington
Baker McKenzie, Norton Rose & Other Top Litigators Foresee Rise in AI, Data & ESG Disputes
Axiom-Ince: SFO Charges Five, Including Former Head, Following Investigation
3 minute readSDT Upholds SLAPP Claim Against Osborne Clarke Partner Advising Nadhim Zahawi
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250