Survey highlights discontent among female lawyers over working hours
Half of all female solicitors believe they work too many hours and that flexible working arrangements negatively affect career development, according to a survey released today (18 March) by the Association of Women Solicitors and King's College London. Eight hundred female solicitors, including partners, associates and assistants at firms ranging from large City outfits to smaller regional and high street practices took part in the study, which was carried out last year.
March 18, 2010 at 07:52 AM
2 minute read
Half of all female solicitors believe they work too many hours and that flexible working arrangements negatively affect career development, according to a survey released today (18 March) by the Association of Women Solicitors and King's College London.
Eight hundred female solicitors, including partners, associates and assistants at firms ranging from large City outfits to smaller regional and high street practices took part in the study, which was carried out last year.
The survey found female associates and assistants to be particularly unhappy about their working hours, with lawyers at these levels claiming to have significantly less control over hours worked than partners, with fewer possibilities to take time off to handle personal or family matters.
While 42% of respondents identified joining the partnership as their main measure of career success, one in three female solicitors did not believe 'there was a good chance to get ahead in their organisation'.
Attitudes to flexible working were ambivalent, with half believing lawyers working flexibly were viewed as less serious about their careers, and 44% claiming it had a negative impact on lawyers' promotion prospects.
Those who worked flexibly themselves (44% of respondents) were less satisfied with their careers than their full-time peers and felt they had significantly fewer opportunities for promotion and more job insecurity.
However, 80% of respondents indicated that they experienced 'real enjoyment in their jobs' and more than three quarters said they were 'deeply committed' to their work.
Commenting on the results, King's College professor Janet Walsh said: "Unfortunately there is a perception among some women solicitors that law firms pay lip service to work/life policies and to flexible working and are not fully committed to their implementation."
Association of Women Solicitors chairwoman and Stephenson Harwood partner Clare McConnell (pictured above) said: "What is clear is that as a profession we still have some way to go to ensuring that aspirations are met. Firms need to develop their business structures and adopt clear career paths and promotion opportunities that are genuinely open to all."
For more on women in law, see Legal Week's In Depth feature.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCanadian Media Giants Sue OpenAI Over Alleged Copyright Violations in ChatGPT Training
3 minute readFormer Head of Finance at DLA Piper and Freshfields Quietly 'Struck Off'
2 minute readAshurst Bolsters Singapore Offering With A&O Shearman Hire
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250