Bakers London restructuring sees £3m redundancy costs
Baker & McKenzie spent over £3m restructuring its London office last year after making 70 employees redundant. The firm, which laid off 21 fee earners, 21 business support staff and 28 secretaries in its London office in May last year, paid out £3.1m in redundancy costs over the 2008-09 financial year, according to the latest limited liability partnership filings at Companies House.
March 31, 2010 at 08:04 PM
2 minute read
Companies House filings show £3.1m in redundancy payouts
Baker & McKenzie spent over £3m restructuring its London office last year after making 70 employees redundant.
The firm, which laid off 21 fee earners, 21 business support staff and 28 secretaries in its London office in May last year, paid out £3.1m in redundancy costs over the 2008-09 financial year, according to the latest limited liability partnership filings at Companies House.
Despite the redundancies, average fee-earner headcount stayed broadly static, increasing by three to 390 year-on-year, as the firm includes its trainee intake in this number. Overall average headcount including all staff dropped 26 to 685 compared to 711 the year previous.
The firm spent £40m on wages and salaries in the last financial year, marking a slight increase on £38.6m the year before.
The average number of partners increased from 78 to 82, with the highest-earning partner taking home £638,137 compared to £826,787 the previous year. Profits per equity partner also dropped, falling 27%, from £572,000 to £418,000; however, the firm had originally anticipated a drop of 33% prior to its accounts being audited.
UK turnover, meanwhile, dropped at the law firm by around 4% coming in at £115m compared to £119.8m in 2007-08.
Bakers City chief financial officer Mark Carter commented: "Like many law firms we experienced a drop-off in transactional activity and legal spend, which contributed to the drop in revenues. However, despite the market conditions we were broadly satisfied with the results, which were in line with our expectations."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCleary vs. White & Case: NYC Showdown Over $5 Billion Brazilian Bankruptcy
Singapore's Drew & Napier Secures $3.5B Award in Civil Suit
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250