CC overhauls bonus system in move away from billable hours focus
Clifford Chance (CC) is to abandon its current bonus system of using billable hours targets as the key benchmark for associate bonuses. CC previously determined associate bonus payouts based on performance, but only if individuals had first reached a target number of hours billed.
April 12, 2010 at 05:37 AM
2 minute read
Clifford Chance (CC) is to abandon its current bonus system of using billable hours targets as the key benchmark for associate bonuses.
CC previously determined associate bonus payouts based on performance, but only if individuals had first reached a target number of hours billed.
The magic circle firm will continue to take billable hours into account when determining bonuses, but will now also give more importance to other criteria, independent of how many hours associates have billed.
Factors under consideration will now include overall achievement, effort, business and technical skills, client satisfaction, teamwork and community work.
The firm has also reworked its bonus levels, with the previous maximum bonus payment of 40% of base salary now only available to senior associates. Previously, any associates with at least four years' post-qualification experience (PQE) were eligible for the top payout.
However, CC said the change would have little effect, as most 4PQE lawyers will have already been promoted to the senior associate rank, and if not, would not normally have been eligible for a 40% bonus payment based on their level of achievement.
No changes have been made to the maximum payout for lower-level associates, with associates with between six months and one year PQE still eligible for a maximum bonus of 20% of base salary and those with more than one and a half year's experience eligible for a 30% payout.
A CC spokesperson said: "Bonus allocations will be discretionary. There will be no fixed correlation between hours and bonuses. Most importantly, there will be no hours target."
The new bonus scheme will come into effect for the 2010-11 financial year.
The news comes after CC last week announced that it is to unfreeze progression through its pay bands and increase the levels of the bands, which will now range from £61,500 for newly-qualified lawyers through to £88,250 at three-and-a-half years' PQE.
Clifford Chance on the Legal Week Wiki
- Related briefing: General Election 2010 – what happens now?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJones Day, BCLP & Other Major Firms Boost European Teams with Key Partner Hires
4 minute read$13.8 Billion Magomedov Claim Thrown Out by UK High Court
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250