Tories reject takeover reform but anger City with immigration cap plan
The Conservative Party has rejected calls to restrict foreign takeovers but will push ahead with moves to curb the level of foreign workers in the UK, as the party unveils its election agenda. In one of the measures most closely watched by City advisers, shadow business secretary Ken Clarke rejected Labour proposals to raise the threshold to secure shareholder approval for corporate takeovers and moves to cut voting rights of short-term shareholders such as hedge funds.
April 14, 2010 at 11:35 AM
3 minute read
The Conservative Party has rejected calls to restrict foreign takeovers but will push ahead with moves to curb the level of foreign workers in the UK, as the party unveils its election agenda.
In one of the measures most closely watched by City advisers, shadow business secretary Ken Clarke rejected Labour proposals to raise the threshold to secure shareholder approval for corporate takeovers and moves to cut voting rights of short-term shareholders such as hedge funds.
The pledge from Clarke (pictured) in an interview published today (14 April) in the Financial Times comes despite calls for reform of the UK's liberal M&A regime in the wake of the takeover this year of Cadbury by US food group Kraft.
The Labour proposals had been unpopular with deal professionals who argued that any move to restrict M&A activity would damage the City's position as a financial centre.
One M&A partner at a leading City practice told Legal Week: "[Labour's] proposals are ill-thought through and totally miss the point – none of the changes would have made the slightest bit of difference in the Cadbury takeover. This is a classic piece of interventionalist politics ending up with the law of unintended consequences."
The launch yesterday (13 April) of the Conservative Party manifesto included contentious proposals to introduce a cap on the numbers of non-European Union workers in the UK. Such a move will be unpopular with large law firms, which have in recent years recruited heavily from Australia, New Zealand and South Africa.
Tony Haque, immigration associate at Baker & McKenzie, commented: "A cap is not something we are familiar with in the UK but we could certainly look to the example of the US where they have had a quota system for over 20 years. [But] the cap has caused problems for law firms as it creates a climate of uncertainty for them when deciding who and how many people they can hire."
As expected, the Conservative manifesto confirmed proposals to hand over much of the powers of the Financial Services Authority to the Bank of England, a move which has divided City opinion.
Ashurst financial institutions partner James Perry commented: "The reality is this is more a case of moving deckchairs than real substance – the direction of regulation in the UK is not going to change. Both of the main parties will take a broadly similar position because they have to. Global and European pressures will dictate that."
Policy commitments from the Conservative Party will be followed closely by City professionals with the party remaining the favourite to win the general election on 6 May. A recent Legal Week poll indicated that the Conservatives will enjoy strong support from the legal profession, with many senior lawyers deserting Labour in recent years.
The Labour Party issued its manifesto on Monday (12 April). Key business policies included the creation of a green investment bank to boost environmental businesses and moves to force institutional shareholders to declare how they vote.
- Click here for a briefing on the Labour Election manifesto from Clifford Chance.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAshurst Beijing Chief Representative Leaves for New York Boutique Sterlington
Baker McKenzie, Norton Rose & Other Top Litigators Foresee Rise in AI, Data & ESG Disputes
Axiom-Ince: SFO Charges Five, Including Former Head, Following Investigation
3 minute readSDT Upholds SLAPP Claim Against Osborne Clarke Partner Advising Nadhim Zahawi
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250