Slaughters heads up raft of advisers as BA price-fixing case collapses
The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has dropped criminal proceedings against four British Airways (BA) executives accused of price-fixing. The case, which was being heard in Southwark Crown Court in front of Mr Justice Owen, collapsed following the discovery of new email evidence last week. In a statement, the OFT said: "The OFT has decided to withdraw its criminal proceedings against four current and former BA executives for price-fixing. Following the OFT's decision, the four defendants were acquitted by the jury at a hearing this morning."
May 10, 2010 at 11:00 AM
2 minute read
The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) has dropped criminal proceedings against four British Airways (BA) executives accused of price-fixing.
The case, which was being heard in Southwark Crown Court in front of Mr Justice Owen, collapsed following the discovery of new email evidence last week.
In a statement, the OFT said: "The OFT has decided to withdraw its criminal proceedings against four current and former BA executives for price-fixing. Following the OFT's decision, the four defendants were acquitted by the jury at a hearing this morning."
The case was originally brought by the OFT in 2008, when the watchdog alleged that four execs – former commercial director Martin George, former head of UK and Ireland sales Alan Burnett, ex-communications head Iain Burns and current sales and marketing director Andrew Crawley – had dishonestly agreed with Virgin Atlantic to fix the prices of fuel surcharges for long-haul passenger flights between 2004 and 2006.
Peters & Peters head of fraud Michael O'Kane advised Burns and Burnett with Matrix Chambers' Ben Emmerson QC and Queen Elizabeth Building's William Boyce QC instructed as counsel respectively.
Meanwhile, Kingsley Napley criminal partner Stephen Pollard advised George with Matrix Chambers' Clare Montgomery QC as counsel, and Irwin Mitchell advised Crawley with 2 Hare Court's Andrew Radcliffe as counsel.
Richard Latham QC of 7 Bedford Row advised the OFT while Slaughter and May advised BA.
The collapse of the case – the first contested prosecution for price-fixing brought by the competition watchdog – is likely to be seen as a serious setback for the OFT. Had the OFT been successful, the defendants could have faced up to five years in jail or received an unlimited fine.
The decision will not affect any civil settlements already agreed by the airlines.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBroadcom Hires From Nuclear Giant to Appoint French Legal Head
GCs Say They are Getting 'Edged Out' of UK Boardrooms
'I Won’t Name the Firm, But...'—Barratt Redrow's Legal Head on External Counsel Red Flags
Trending Stories
- 1The Key Moves in the Reshuffling German Legal Market as 2025 Dawns
- 2Social Media Celebrities Clash in $100M Lawsuit
- 3Federal Judge Sets 2026 Admiralty Bench Trial in Baltimore Bridge Collapse Litigation
- 4Trump Media Accuses Purchaser Rep of Extortion, Harassment After Merger
- 5Judge Slashes $2M in Punitive Damages in Sober-Living Harassment Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250