Hammonds managing partner role up for grabs as Crossley's term comes to an end
Hammonds is set for a contested election process as potential managing partner candidates to replace Peter Crossley emerge. It is unclear whether Crossley, whose second three-year term at the firm's helm comes to a close in May 2011, is set to stand again; however, a number of partners are currently being touted as candidates.
May 26, 2010 at 04:55 AM
2 minute read
Hammonds is set for a contested election process as potential managing partner candidates to replace Peter Crossley emerge.
It is unclear whether Crossley (pictured), whose second three-year term at the firm's helm comes to a close in May 2011, is set to stand again; however, a number of partners are currently being touted as candidates.
Names being linked with the role include corporate head William Downs, tax head Bernhard Gilbey, COO Sue Nickson, London head Robert Weekes and head of disputes Simon Miller.
Downs has been a partner since 1989 and currently serves as head of both corporate and energy and utilities. Nickson became partner and head of employment in 1991, served as human capital group head from 1998-2009 and took up the COO post in 2008.
Meanwhile Gilbey, who became partner in 1998 and now heads up the tax group, was a full-time executive on the partnership board between 2006 and 2008 and was responsible for the design and implementation of the firm's strategy.
Weekes joined the Hammonds partnership in 2001, becoming London head in 2008. Miller successfully represented the firm in its long-running profits dispute against former partners and served as Leeds office head for two years until 2009, before taking up the post of disputes head.
The official election process is due to start in the autumn, with the successful candidate taking up the post from May 2011.
Former litigation chief Crossley was re-appointed in 2008 for a second term as managing partner in an uncontested election. He is widely credited with steering Hammonds through its most challenging period in recent history.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJenner & Block Expands London Team with Baker McKenzie Hire to Lead New Practice Area
2 minute readBennett Jones Securities Partner Alan Gardner Remembered as a Brilliant Lawyer & Mentor
3 minute readFreshfields Leads European M&A Rankings Again in 2024, as U.S. Firms Gain Market Share
5 minute readHSF Defends Bayer on Roundup Class Action as Litigation Comes to an End in Australia
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Arbitrators Under Fire for Allegedly Forcing Workers to 'Stay or Pay' Employers
- 2Plaintiff Narrowly Avoids Dismissal Over Lengthy Complaint Filed in Federal Court
- 3Goodwin to Launch Brussels Office With Quinn Emanuel Antitrust Partner
- 4Looking to the Future of the FDA and Its Impact on Drug Regulation in 2025
- 5Pennsylvania Firms Join Partnership Promotion Parade
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250