Scots Law Society backed to retain dual role after referendum
The Law Society of Scotland (LSS) is to retain both its trade union and regulatory roles following a members' vote, in the latest stage of the heated debate regarding legal services reform north of the border. Seventy-three percent of members voted in favour of the LSS maintaining its dual role when asked a single question: 'Should the Law Society of Scotland as statutory regulator continue to be responsible for promotion of the interests of, and the representation of, solicitors in Scotland?'
May 26, 2010 at 08:15 AM
2 minute read
The Law Society of Scotland (LSS) is to retain both its trade union and regulatory roles following a members' vote, in the latest stage of the heated debate regarding legal services reform north of the border.
Seventy-three percent of members voted in favour of the LSS maintaining its dual role when asked a single question: 'Should the Law Society of Scotland as statutory regulator continue to be responsible for promotion of the interests of, and the representation of, solicitors in Scotland?'
The referendum, which was called by members opposed to the LSS retaining both briefs, saw 3,037 members vote in favour of maintaining the status quo while 1,101 voted against. The overall turnout of 4,138 represented almost 40% of LSS members.
LSS president Ian Smart (pictured) said: "The resounding result is a mandate for the society to continue to represent, regulate and support its members. It gives the society a green light to continue its programme of change including reform of its governance structure and member services."
The result of the vote is in contrast to the stance of the Law Society of England and Wales, which put its regulatory function outside its operational control three years ago with the creation of the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).
The decision to create the SRA was a key recommendation of the Clementi report, which recommended that professional legal bodies holding both regulatory and representative responsibilities should separate those functions.
The LSS vote is the latest stage of an increasingly fractious debate in Scotland regarding the path of market liberalisation in the wake of the Legal Services Act, which will allow alternative business structures (ABS) to provide legal services.
Scottish lawyers voted marginally in favour of the introduction of ABS in Scotland in April, but the issue has split the local profession with larger national law firms supporting liberalisation while many smaller practices support the status quo. Despite attempts to broker a compromise where ABS would be allowed provided lawyers remain in control of the business, the issue remains contentious.
Earlier this year the Legal Services Board confirmed that applications to set up an ABS will be accepted from next summer, with successful applicants due to be up and running from 6 October 2011.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Subsidiaries in Belgium and France Sued by DRC Over Conflict Minerals
2 minute readDLA Piper, Heuking & Other Key Moves as German Legal Market Reshuffles Ahead of 2025
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250