Eversheds targets new markets and Euro rebrand
Eversheds is reviewing its presence in a number of jurisdictions and taking a closer look at emerging markets under proposals outlined at the firm's partnership conference. At the conference, which took place in London last month (20 May), China, India, Russia and Latin America were highlighted as priority jurisdictions for the firm.
June 09, 2010 at 05:33 AM
2 minute read
Partners identify key emerging markets and vote to roll out Eversheds as sole brand for foreign network
Eversheds is reviewing its presence in a number of jurisdictions and taking a closer look at emerging markets under proposals outlined at the firm's partnership conference.
At the conference, which took place in London last month (20 May), China, India, Russia and Latin America were highlighted as priority jurisdictions for the firm.
The countries were selected by a partner vote to determine which areas had the most client demand.
The firm has taken a number of steps to boost its presence in the emerging markets, including sending corporate partner David Levin on a six-month secondment to Russian firm Monastyrsky Zyuba Stepanov & Partners earlier this year.
The firm's partnership also took a vote on the name of some of its international offices, electing to drop local names from Eversheds International offices, where permitted.
This would affect offices such as Spain, where the firm is currently known as Eversheds Lupicinio, and Ireland, which operates as Eversheds O'Donnell Sweeney. Other jurisdictions affected could include Holland, Germany, Switzerland, Estonia, Latvia and Slovakia.
Eversheds chief executive Bryan Hughes (pictured) commented: "There is a clear mandate from interested parties that this is something that they would like to happen, but people appreciate that rebranding as Eversheds cannot be done overnight."
The firm is currently locked in an ongoing dispute with the Law Society of South Africa, after Eversheds' South African ally, Routledge Modise, ditched its local name and rebranded as Eversheds last year.
Other matters discussed during the conference included opportunities arising from the Legal Services Act, including alternative business structures, which allow for outside investment into firms.
Hughes added: "After coming through a difficult 18 months, we feel positive and are ready to draw a line in the sand and move on."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Subsidiaries in Belgium and France Sued by DRC Over Conflict Minerals
2 minute readDLA Piper, Heuking & Other Key Moves as German Legal Market Reshuffles Ahead of 2025
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250