Commentary: Recent Madrid launch reveals Olswang's global aspirations
What does Olswang want to be? Chief executive David Stewart puts it clearly: "A leading and distinctive full service firm across the sectors of technology, media and real estate and a dominant player not just in the UK but internationally as well." The firm has already largely delivered on the first part of the equation, building a strong brand and genuinely distinctive practice focused on some attractive industries. But the latter part the formula - international reach - will be a far taller order for a firm that until recently avoided expansion beyond the UK.
June 22, 2010 at 01:06 AM
4 minute read
Belated international push sees Olswang determined to make up for lost time
What does Olswang want to be? Chief executive David Stewart puts it clearly: "A leading and distinctive full service firm across the sectors of technology, media and real estate and a dominant player not just in the UK but internationally as well."
The firm has already largely delivered on the first part of the equation, building a strong brand and genuinely distinctive practice focused on some attractive industries. But the latter part the formula – international reach – will be a far taller order for a firm that until recently avoided expansion beyond the UK.
Yet Stewart's statement goes some way to explain the news announced last week that Olswang is set to open in Madrid in September. With the recent hire of Bird & Bird's Spanish corporate head Javier Vasserot, the launch gives the firm its third international office alongside Brussels and Germany. Vasserot, who Bird & Bird hired four years ago to launch its Spanish corporate practice, has a solid local reputation, but at present remains the only senior Spanish lawyer Olswang has on board. The firm hopes to quickly expand its ranks to cover banking, insolvency and litigation when it launches in September.
The firm says the Spanish launch is just the start of a sustained push to build its international offering after committing to a programme of international expansion at a partners conference last November. Interestingly, Stewart says expansion is not led primarily by client demand but by a strategic drive to target the firm's 'aspirational' client base. To achieve this aspirational strategy, the firm intends to open its own offices as well as building a series of alliances and 'best friend' relationships. In the short term that leaves Olswang looking at options for its own launches in Western Europe, with France in particular viewed as a priority.
Further afield, the firm is looking to put in place arrangements to replace the underwhelming alliance it operated with Greenberg Traurig until the Florida-based firm last year decided to launch independently in London. With Olswang moving to build a referral relationship around top-tier West Coast firm Cooley, the Holborn-based outfit at least has a firm to work with that more closely mirrors its domestic practice. How this relationship develops will be interesting, and maybe even key to Olswang's future.
In the medium to longer term, the firm has its eye on Asia, where it has hopes of securing alliances or even full mergers. Yet there is no doubt that Olswang will struggle to make an impact in Asia coming this late to the game with, in global terms, limited resources and experience. Understandably, some rivals have their doubts about the firm's ability to go international when so many rivals – in particular Taylor Wessing and Bird & Bird – are years ahead of it in this respect. It is hard not to view the firm's current strategy as a compromise between differing paths. Arguably, the most credible approach would see Olswang tie up with a US firm, which would give the combined firm a stronger platform to build in Europe and Asia. But the firm is not there yet.
If it continues to go solo, it is essential the firm maintains rock-solid financial growth to cover the investment costs and present an attractive home to potential recruits. On this front, Olswang can point to a robust performance for 2009-10, with a 2% rise in revenue to £91m and partner profits rebounding sharply to £420,000.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250