Halliwells partners could face £10m joint liability to banks
Existing and former Halliwells partners may find themselves jointly liable for around £10m owed to the national firm's banks as it moves to thrash out a deal to transfer the business. Halliwells' banks collectively lent partners around £10m to fund capital contributions, which the law firm confirmed it is unable to pay back. Usually a law firm undertakes to pay the loan - which is taken out by partners and put into the firm on entering the equity - back to the bank on the partner's departure. However, lenders could now turn to individual partners to recover what they are owed.
June 30, 2010 at 07:08 PM
4 minute read
Spectre of administration raises possibility that partners could be liable for millions in capital contributions
Existing and former Halliwells partners may find themselves jointly liable for around £10m owed to the national firm's banks as it moves to thrash out a deal to transfer the business.
Halliwells' banks collectively lent partners around £10m to fund capital contributions, which the law firm confirmed it is unable to pay back. Usually a law firm undertakes to pay the loan – which is taken out by partners and put into the firm on entering the equity – back to the bank on the partner's departure. However, lenders could now turn to individual partners to recover what they are owed.
In addition to initial capital loaned by Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) to partners on entering the equity, a number of partners could find themselves liable for loans taken out for a 2008 capital injection. Equity partners were asked to double their capital in the firm, borrowing the money from Swedish bank Handelsbanken. At the same time, fixed-share partners were asked to contribute between £10,000 and £20,000 each.
This means in total some partners could be liable to pay back loans of hundreds of thousands of pounds.
A number of ex-partners have expressed concern that they will potentially be left bankrupt if the banks seek to recover the money. If this is the case, many will not be able to remain in their new firms' partnership as UK laws and the majority of partnership deeds require automatic expulsion of personally insolvent partners.
Halliwells, which filed a notice of intention to appoint an administrator last Thursday (24 June), is currently in discussions with a number of firms to sell off all or part of the business. It is understood that RBS hopes to secure around £12m from the sale of the firm. Halliwells' corporate debt with RBS currently stands at £17.7m.
Hill Dickinson, which is in detailed discussions to take over the majority of Halliwells' business and is the only firm to set out a formal offer so far, has offered to repay the bank a portion of the capital owed as part of the deal.
If Halliwells and Hill Dickinson cannot come to an arrangement it is likely that Halliwells will look to sell off parts of the business to a number of firms. Barlow Lyde & Gilbert (BLG) is understood to have expressed an interest in taking on Halliwells' 100-strong insurance team for £5m.
The firm is hoping to agree a sale without having to enter into a long process of administration, working with accountants BDO Stoy Hayward to consider its options. Currently there is a moratorium on Halliwells' liabilities, and the firm has up to 10 working days from the point of filing notice to find a buyer. However, the firm could extend this deadline by filing rolling notices.
Halliwells said in a statement: "Halliwells LLP is in advanced discussions for the transfer of the business to another highly-regarded firm of solicitors due to events that have adversely impacted the finances of the firm. The underlying business remains strong and has attracted interest from a number of parties."
Hill Dickinson and BLG declined to comment.
Separately, it has emerged that Halliwells laid off its seven-lawyer London real estate team at the end of May, including two partners.
Additional reporting by Sofia Lind.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllApple Subsidiaries in Belgium and France Sued by DRC Over Conflict Minerals
2 minute readDLA Piper, Heuking & Other Key Moves as German Legal Market Reshuffles Ahead of 2025
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250