Time to take that unsexy job?
Last week, an article about alternative careers for out-of-work lawyers by a legal headhunter struck a nerve in the legal community. Katherine Frink-Hamlett's article in the New York Law Journal wasn't revolutionary - she suggested that the jobless consider careers in procurement, compliance and law firm administration - but it was practical and sobering.
July 08, 2010 at 10:46 AM
3 minute read
Last week, an article about alternative careers for out-of-work lawyers by a legal headhunter struck a nerve in the legal community.
Katherine Frink-Hamlett's article in the New York Law Journal wasn't revolutionary – she suggested that the jobless consider careers in procurement, compliance and law firm administration – but it was practical and sobering.
Implicit in Frink-Hamlett's piece was a message that many do not want to hear: stop dreaming about that associate or junior lawyer position and get a job – any job – where your law degree might be an asset, so that you can start paying off those law school loans. "No one wants to say that some jobs just aren't coming back," she says.
So why did she focus on those three fields for lawyers to consider? She explains that procurement (managing the way a corporation purchases service and goods) and compliance (overseeing a company's compliance with local and federal rules and regulations) keeps aspiring lawyers in the legal waters – though you don't need a legal background to do those jobs. "Procurement is essentially contract work," she says. "Compliance used to be the bottom of the legal food chain, but in recent years, it's a necessity [for advancement in a corporation]."
Of the three fields, administrative work in a law firm, such as human resources, recruiting, or marketing, might not help your legal career. "But if you have an employment law background, it will help you get a human resources job," she says.
I asked why Frink-Hamlett omitted another obvious alternative: paralegal. But she says firms have no interest in people with law degrees for those positions. "We've been told by big firms, 'No lawyers [for paralegal spots].'" The reason, she adds, is that it's awkward to have someone who just spent large amounts of money on their legal education working alongside a recent graduate.
The careers that Frink-Hamlett suggested are pretty dull. Stamping procurement contracts, sorting out tedious compliance rules, and working in human resources in a law firm all sound somewhat mind-numbing. Of course, being a junior associate at a law firm can be dreary too. The difference is that dreariness as a newly-qualified lawyer is significantly better paid dreariness.
Still, there's no question that Frink-Hamlett is onto something – that recent law graduates have to be flexible and realistic. And shouldn't law school career placement offices use more imagination in what they propose as career options?
The conflict, says Frink-Hamlett, is that law schools have a brand to protect, and the brand becomes compromised when graduates can't land legal jobs: "Law schools have to be careful not to dilute the value of their law degree."
But what's the brand worth when law students aren't getting jobs anyway?
This article first appeared on The Careerist, a blog by the American Lawyer Media Group.
For more Careerist articles, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham's magic circle strikes, pay rises and EY's legal takeover: the best of Legal Week over the last few weeks
3 minute readJob losses, soaring partner profits and Freshfields exits - the best of Legal Week over the past two weeks
3 minute readMagic circle PEP hikes, the associate pay conundrum and more #MeToo - the best of Legal Week last week
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250