Tried and trusted focus reaps rewards for Travers
Anyone who doubts the value of sticking to your gameplan would do well to look at the recent performance of Travers Smith, which as we reported this month has outpaced all comparable City practices in 2009-10 by managing to hike profits per equity partner (PEP) by 53% to £705,000. In isolation, such a rise in profits can be dismissed in a year in which many firms saw rebounding PEP numbers on the back of tough cost squeezes. However, Travers was one of the few to also manage a rise in revenues - by a healthy 11.6% - so the firm is clearly growing the business.
July 21, 2010 at 07:22 AM
4 minute read
Travers shows the value of sticking to your gameplan as private equity leads revival
Anyone who doubts the value of sticking to your gameplan would do well to look at the recent performance of Travers Smith, which as we reported this month has outpaced all comparable City practices in 2009-10 by managing to hike profits per equity partner (PEP) by 53% to £705,000.
In isolation, such a rise in profits can be dismissed in a year in which many firms saw rebounding PEP numbers on the back of tough cost squeezes. However, Travers was one of the few to also manage a rise in revenues – by a healthy 11.6% – so the firm is clearly growing the business.
This performance was, to a considerable extent, thanks to its 20-partner corporate practice, which had been hard hit during the previous two years due to its heavy reliance on the battered private equity sector. Handily, a relative revival in private equity has helped the firm regain its pace. You only have to glance at the recent mandates to see that Travers has secured a very impressive run of work from September through to Easter.
With the firm putting away 10 or so sizeable deals during the financial year, three stand out: acting for Bridgepoint Capital on its £955m sale of Pets at Home to Kohlberg Kravis Roberts; its instruction for Intermediate Capital Group on a large investment in CPA Global; and advising the vendors on the sale of pharma services firm Marken to a company backed by Apax.
Of course, cynics will point out that the firm has benefited from its unusual June year-end and that Travers has traditionally been best represented in private equity on the less profitable management roles. Yet the range of the deals it has handled over the year, combined with the sheer breadth of the upper-mid-market buyout houses that now regularly call on Travers as lead corporate adviser, do not back up that familiar claim. If this is luck, the firm made a fair chunk of it itself. And while it is true that Travers has worked hard to build its links with management teams, with the firm currently having 100 portfolio companies on its books, many of them needing advice, that hardly appears a weakness of its practice .
Added to which, Travers, which has eight partners focused on buyout work, including well-regarded operators like private equity head Phil Sanderson, Paul Dolman, Helen Croke and corporate head Chris Hale, appears to be benefiting from its steadfast commitment to the sector.
"We were able to keep our team together, perhaps more than some rivals, and that was noticed by clients I think," reflects Hale (pictured above).
Certainly the firm's team looks well positioned after two years in which larger private equity rivals like Clifford Chance and Ashurst have been unsettled. In its section of the market, there will also be satisfaction that the profits gap with its old sparring partner Macfarlanes has finally been closed.
Travers has also had a solid run for general corporate work, winning a role on the London Stock Exchange's purchase of much-touted online trading platform Turquoise, advising Channel Four on its Freeview HD launch and handling several large listings on the Alternative Investment Market.
Nevertheless the firm acknowledges that it wants to broaden its corporate practice, which has historically tilted heavily towards private equity houses, brokers and institutions. As Sanderson puts it: "We need to be broader in corporate, full stop. We are known as an M&A shop but there is a space for us to get our brand out there as a broader practice."
That said, narrow has been paying pretty well so far.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllA&O Shearman, Cleary Gottlieb Act on $700M Dunlop Tire Brand Sale to Japan's Sumitomo
Latham, Simpson Thacher and Brazilian Duo Ride Uptick in LatAm M&A
Kim & Chang, Freshfields, A&O Shearman Take Top Spots for Highest Collective Deal Value as APAC M&A Grew By Just 1% in 2024
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250