Camerons markets alternative billing and fixed fee deal to 3,500 clients
CMS Cameron McKenna has launched a major alternative billing campaign in a bid to boost client loyalty and attract new business. The firm is offering a 'no questions asked' fixed-fee payment system, which will see clients pay for legal advice on a regular monthly basis.
August 04, 2010 at 08:59 PM
2 minute read
3,500 clients sent information about new alternative fees system
CMS Cameron McKenna has launched a major alternative billing campaign in a bid to boost client loyalty and attract new business.
The firm is offering a 'no questions asked' fixed-fee payment system, which will see clients pay for legal advice on a regular monthly basis.
Camerons has confirmed that one major power client has already signed up to the arrangement for one year, and that it is in talks with several other clients about similar deals. The firm has also said that it has offered a major oil client a fee cap tied to the price of oil.
As part of the campaign, Camerons has sent 3,500 clients information about the available alternative billing options, including five specific alternative fee arrangements.
These include fixed fees, hybrid fixed-fee/capped-fee deals and rate models based on added value and client loyalty.
The document, put together by managing director of business development Judith Prime, comes after a February client survey showed a significant increase in interest in alternative billing.
The guidelines come with a scorecard that lists the factors that make a client eligible for a reduction in fees, which include:
- paying bills within 14 days;
- giving Camerons more than 33% of all legal work;
- supplying work across practice groups; and
- agreeing to an associate as the main point of contact at the firm rather than a partner.
Camerons senior partner Richard Price (pictured) and managing partner Duncan Weston will personally visit clients to discuss fee arrangements.
Price commented: "This is part of a campaign to set ourselves apart from competitors, but there are also some clients that need help in understanding how these arrangements work.
"There is a lot of talk about value for money and fees but it doesn't provide you with much substance. These guidelines, while not comprehensive, give a good idea of how the client can achieve better value."
For more, see Special report: The future of fees – transforming client billing
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All‘A Slave Drivers' Contract’: Evri Legal Director Grilled by MPs
Serco Drops Three Firms Including Clifford Chance from Legal Panel
GCs Responsible for Gender Balanced Boardrooms Under New EU Rules
Trending Stories
- 1Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
- 222-Count Indictment Is Just the Start of SCOTUSBlog Atty's Legal Problems, Experts Say
- 3Judge Rejects Walgreens' Contractual Dispute Against Founder's Family Member
- 4FTC Sues PepsiCo for Alleged Price Break to Big-Box Retailer, Incurs Holyoak's Wrath
- 5Greenberg Traurig Litigation Co-Chair Returning After Three Years as US Attorney
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250