SRA to reject law firm calls to allow early ABS investment deals
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is set to hold firm on the start date for Alternative Business Structures (ABS), despite calls from law firms to allow early agreements. In July last year the regulator stated that firms would be prohibited from signing agreements with outside investors ahead of 6 October 2011.
September 08, 2010 at 04:48 AM
2 minute read
SRA paper dims expectations of faster timetable for ABS rollout
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is set to hold firm on the start date for Alternative Business Structures (ABS), despite calls from law firms to allow early agreements.
In July last year the regulator stated that firms would be prohibited from signing agreements with outside investors ahead of 6 October 2011.
This prompted a number of firms to request that the SRA relax the schedule and allow them to sign up to deals to receive external investment ahead of the issuance of the first ABS licences next year.
The SRA is set to take a final decision on whether to relax its guidance at a board meeting tomorrow (10 September), but has published a consultation paper which strongly indicates that it will not change its stance.
The paper says: "The SRA will focus on providing assistance and guidance to facilitate the implementation of ABS after 6 October 2011 but will not relax the guidance, because regulatory mechanisms applicable to ABS in order to protect the public and as mandated by Parliament will not be in place until then."
Without any changes, firms will remain prohibited from signing binding agreements with investors ahead of October 2011, but will be able to discuss future arrangements with investors as long as the final decision is taken after the implementation of the new rules.
Tony Williams (pictured) of legal consultancy firm Jomati commented: "The message up to now has been very much 'don't jump the gun'. There was a hope around a year ago that we would have an interim regime but it is becoming very clear that will not be the case."
However, the SRA confirmed that a final decision has yet to be made, with a spokesperson commenting: "The paper was produced to prompt discussion. In light of that paper it is now up to the SRA board to take a decision."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJones Day, BCLP & Other Major Firms Boost European Teams with Key Partner Hires
4 minute read$13.8 Billion Magomedov Claim Thrown Out by UK High Court
Ropes & Gray, Mori Hamada, Nishimura & Asahi Act on Bain Capital’s $634M Aircraft Business Acquisition in Japan
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Spends 3 Hours Explaining His Decision
- 2Morgan Lewis Closes Shenzhen Office Less Than 2 Years After Launch
- 3On The Move: Freeman Mathis & Gary Adds Florida Partners, Employment Pro Joins Jackson Lewis
- 4New Trouble for Allstate: National Class Action Targets Insurer
- 5Pam Bondi's Lobbying and Law Firm Revenue Disclosed
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250