Partners undaunted by law firm collapses
Partners remain bullish that their firms can withstand financial shocks or the impact of mass partner departures despite the aftermath of Halliwells' recent collapse, according to new research. The latest Big Question survey found that 77% of partners remain confident that their firm is able to avoid 'severe financial problems' or a full-scale collapse. In contrast, only 17% of the 158 respondents to the survey admitted that they were 'a little' worried, while 6% of partners stated that they were 'very worried' about their firm.
September 15, 2010 at 07:26 PM
4 minute read
Despite the recent fall of Halliwells, partners remain confident that their firms have the necessary policies in place to maintain financial stability. Friederike Heine reports
Partners remain bullish that their firms can withstand financial shocks or the impact of mass partner departures despite the aftermath of Halliwells' recent collapse, according to new research.
The latest Big Question survey found that 77% of partners remain confident that their firm is able to avoid 'severe financial problems' or a full-scale collapse.
In contrast, only 17% of the 158 respondents to the survey admitted that they were 'a little' worried, while 6% of partners stated that they were 'very worried' about their firm.
Just under half of respondents (45%) felt achieving scale, such as having £100m-plus revenues, could ensure significant protection from financial shocks for law firms. A similar percentage (46%) of partners felt that scale could provide 'some' protection.
Hogan Lovells head of real estate disputes Nicholas Cheffings commented: "Because of the broad nature of their practices and client base, the larger firms tend to be less exposed to these kinds of problems than firms of a similar size and nature to Halliwells. They are less exposed to one singular problem and so, if something goes pear-shaped such as a major client relationship, it is unlikely to be fatal to the business as a whole."
The vast majority of partners (92%) felt confident that their firm has effective policies in place to ensure that the business can withstand financial shocks or the loss of a high-billing team, while only 8% did not.
The results show that partners at commercial law firms remain bullish despite the collapse of Halliwells – the largest law firm failure ever in the UK – and the bankruptcy of several large US law firms over the last two years.
Linklaters banking partner Gideon Moore commented: "The most important asset of any law firm is its people, and if a sufficient number of good people leave, it could, all too easily, lead to the demise of that law firm. By reference to past performance, law firms may appear to be relatively immune to collapse, but it is important that firms learn from this particular casualty."
Partners said that the principal factors that make commercial law firms vulnerable to severe financial problems or collapse are poor financial management and excessive debt, which were highlighted by 60% and 56% of respondents respectively.
Other issues highlighted by partners, who were asked to identify the two factors that make law firms the most vulnerable, were 'bad management or leadership' (33%), 'too many partners leaving' (18%) and 'excessive property liabilities' (18%).
Partners were relatively unconcerned about being dropped by clients, poor risk management or the fallout from a problematic merger.
"What really cripples law firms is high levels of debt," said Ashurst construction partner Ann Minogue. "The top 10 law firms in the City generally don't have extensive borrowing. The problem with some of the smaller firms is that they continue making distributions although they can no longer afford it."
Despite their confidence regarding their own firms, the majority of partners do consider a law firm collapse to be a major threat. Two out of three partners stated that their firm had reviewed case studies or examples of how professional services firms have collapsed from which to draw constructive lessons (63%).
More than one in three partners (36%) also think there is a considerable chance that a UK top 50 law firm will collapse over the next five years due to a major negligence claim. Twenty-eight percent of partners think there is a little risk of this happing (28%), while only 1% think that there is no chance.
Cheffings added: "I am certain that the collapse of Halliwells will act as a wake-up call for many of the smaller UK firms in the same way that the shock of Arthur Andersen's collapse a few years ago sounded alarm bells for the large international firms – it's the 'if it can happen to them…' syndrome."
Partners on law firm collapses
• 92% believe their firm has effective policies to ensure it can withstand financial shocks or team losses
• 91% believe that scale increases financial stability
• 77% are confident their firm can avoid major financial problems or a collapse
• 36% see a substantive risk of a top 50 law firm collapsing over the next five years due to a negligence claim
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Big Law Heavyweights Wrestle in High-Stakes Sale of Venezuela’s Citgo Big Law Heavyweights Wrestle in High-Stakes Sale of Venezuela’s Citgo](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/292/2024/07/CITGO-Headquarters-767x633.jpg)
Big Law Heavyweights Wrestle in High-Stakes Sale of Venezuela’s Citgo
![Cleary vs. White & Case: NYC Showdown Over $5 Billion Brazilian Bankruptcy Cleary vs. White & Case: NYC Showdown Over $5 Billion Brazilian Bankruptcy](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/389/2023/04/New-York-767x633.jpg)
Cleary vs. White & Case: NYC Showdown Over $5 Billion Brazilian Bankruptcy
![Singapore's Drew & Napier Secures $3.5B Award in Civil Suit Singapore's Drew & Napier Secures $3.5B Award in Civil Suit](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2024/07/Singapore-Dollars-767x633-1.jpg)
Singapore's Drew & Napier Secures $3.5B Award in Civil Suit
![A&O Shearman Hires Ashurst's Head of Restructuring for Italy A&O Shearman Hires Ashurst's Head of Restructuring for Italy](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2024/09/Paolo-Manganelli-767x633.jpg)
Trending Stories
- 1Parties’ Reservation of Rights Defeats Attempt to Enforce Settlement in Principle
- 2ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 3States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 4Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 5Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250