A GC walks into a bar... - the in-house counsel instructing barristers directly
When Orange and T-Mobile announced in July that they would review their line-up of legal advisers in the wake of their merger to become Everything Everywhere, the newly-formed company's general counsel James Blendis (formerly head of legal at T-Mobile) was keen to stress that the new panel would include barristers chambers as well as law firms. Blendis told Legal Week at the time: "We have had success instructing directly to the Bar in the past and would be keen to continue working in this way with the larger group of internal lawyers."
September 17, 2010 at 04:49 AM
2 minute read
In-house counsel are increasingly instructing barristers directly, but, despite some major cost benefits, it's an approach that doesn't work for everyone. Alex Aldridge reports
When Orange and T-Mobile announced in July that they would review their line-up of legal advisers in the wake of their merger to become Everything Everywhere, the newly-formed company's general counsel James Blendis (formerly head of legal at T-Mobile) was keen to stress that the new panel would include barristers chambers as well as law firms. Blendis (pictured) told Legal Week at the time: "We have had success instructing directly to the Bar in the past and would be keen to continue working in this way with the larger group of internal lawyers."
Blendis is not alone in this respect, with various local authorities appointing barristers' chambers to their 'super panels' over the last 18 months and Barclays' in-house litigation team taking steps earlier this year to formalise its existing relationships with chambers including Fountain Court and 3 Verulam Buildings. Indeed, a recent survey by research company Winmark concluded that 48% of general counsel are increasingly bypassing law firms to go directly to the Bar.
Value
There is no doubt that barristers, particularly at the more junior end of the profession, are good value when compared directly to solicitors. You'll pay £200 for an hour of the time of a fairly junior City law firm associate whose work is likely to have to be checked by a supervising senior colleague – adding another layer of expense to the process. For around the same money in-house lawyers can instruct a commercial barrister at a top chambers in the five-plus years' call bracket, who is used to working independently.
"Headline rates for even junior solicitors at the major City firms can be extortionate now," argues Ben Lambert, general counsel of Veolia Environmental Services. "On ad hoc, non-transactional matters you can get far more for your money with a reasonably experienced barrister."
Not only are barristers cheaper, there is also a feeling among in-house counsel that those at the top chambers are, generally speaking, brighter and better technical lawyers than their solicitor counterparts.
"Dare I say it as a solicitor myself, but barristers tend to be a bit more intelligent than us – the ones at the top sets are the cr
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKPMG's Bid To Practice Law in US On Hold As Arizona Court Exercises Caution
Combative Arguments at EU's Highest Court Over Google's €4.13B Antitrust Fine Emphasize High Stakes and Invoke Trump
4 minute readLaw Firms 'Struggling' With Partner Pay Segmentation, as Top Rainmakers Bring In More Revenue
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Bass Berry & Sims Relocates to Nashville Office Designed to Encourage Collaboration, Inclusion
- 2Legaltech Rundown: McDermott Will & Emery Invests $10 Million in The LegalTech Fund, LexisNexis Releases Conversational Search for Nexis+ AI, and More
- 3The TikTokification of the Courtroom
- 4New Jersey’s Arbitration Appeal Deadline—A Call for Clarity
- 5Law Firms Look to Gen Z for AI Skills, as 'Data Becomes the Oil of Legal'
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250