Lawyers on alert as competition bodies issue joint M&A guidance for first time
The Competition Commission and the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) have published joint merger assessment guidelines for the first time, in a move which has intensified speculation that the two bodies could merge to form a single oversight body. The joint guidelines, which were published last week (16 September), have been created to provide greater clarity to companies and their advisers on how both bodies will assess the competitive impact of a merger. The guidelines revise and expand guidance previously issued separately by the two watchdogs, with partners at City firms praising the move as a "productive step forward".
September 22, 2010 at 06:01 AM
3 minute read
Lawyers welcome joint approach as proposals are floated to unite competition agencies
The Competition Commission and the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) have published joint merger assessment guidelines for the first time, in a move which has intensified speculation that the two bodies could merge to form a single oversight body.
The joint guidelines, which were published last week (16 September), have been created to provide greater clarity to companies and their advisers on how both bodies will assess the competitive impact of a merger.
The guidelines revise and expand guidance previously issued separately by the two watchdogs, with partners at City firms praising the move as a "productive step forward".
"The fact that this is joint guidance from two institutions is positive and constructive," said Linklaters competition partner Alec Burnside.
"The trend towards offering substantive guidance of this kind has gathered pace in recent years. The substantive aspect of merger control has become more sophisticated and the quality of assessment has also increased."
The new guidelines set out in detail the latest economic thinking on how to assess mergers.
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer competition partner John Davies (pictured) said: "We welcome the fact that the OFT and the Commission worked closely with the EU and the US, which should help the authorities to achieve greater international convergence and consistency in substantive merger assessment."
Baker & McKenzie corporate partner Robert Adam commented: "Although the new guidelines are not a watershed, they should provide more flexibility for companies and their advisers. The guidelines should provide more scope for both parties to use different arguments in order to get a positive result."
Despite the positive response from partners to the new guidelines, many acknowledged that there are significant tensions between the two bodies.
Nabarro EU and competition partner Brian Sher commented: "There is an inherent tension in these joint guidelines, because the two bodies have very different roles in merger control. In recent years there has been a trend in OFT practice away from detailed market definition and towards an emphasis on assessing whether there is a competition problem. The Commission has more time, and so the balance is a little different there."
Separately, the Government has confirmed that it is considering merging the OFT and the Commission. Competition advisers to the two bodies have suggested that once Commission chairman Peter Freeman stands down from his post, the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills could push through a merger.
One partner commented: "Having two agencies is very expensive and the Competition Commission's investigations are very intensive and thus costly. Frankly, the Commission is a luxury we can no longer afford."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Perkins Coie Builds in London With Ex-Norton Rose Fulbright Brussels Head Perkins Coie Builds in London With Ex-Norton Rose Fulbright Brussels Head](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/7c/90/ad855f80454fb72398da4f0c1f4b/cole-miranda-5x6-767x633.jpg)
Perkins Coie Builds in London With Ex-Norton Rose Fulbright Brussels Head
2 minute read![Combative Arguments at EU's Highest Court Over Google's €4.13B Antitrust Fine Emphasize High Stakes and Invoke Trump Combative Arguments at EU's Highest Court Over Google's €4.13B Antitrust Fine Emphasize High Stakes and Invoke Trump](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/bd/aa/17b2d3f34add8eecd89c67e33ab3/adobestock-1093137278-editorial-use-only-767x633.jpg)
Combative Arguments at EU's Highest Court Over Google's €4.13B Antitrust Fine Emphasize High Stakes and Invoke Trump
4 minute read![‘Raises More Questions Than Answers’: Partners Puzzled by Leadership Change at UK Competition Regulator ‘Raises More Questions Than Answers’: Partners Puzzled by Leadership Change at UK Competition Regulator](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/a9/aa/8610bdf3436fb7c12a41bc9e3f6d/city-of-london-767x633.jpg)
‘Raises More Questions Than Answers’: Partners Puzzled by Leadership Change at UK Competition Regulator
![CMA Uses New Competition Powers to Investigate Google Over Search Advertising CMA Uses New Competition Powers to Investigate Google Over Search Advertising](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/7a/19/1773f2f04ea39a16af094bbb2b80/google-sign-767x633.jpg)
CMA Uses New Competition Powers to Investigate Google Over Search Advertising
Trending Stories
- 1Parties’ Reservation of Rights Defeats Attempt to Enforce Settlement in Principle
- 2ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 3States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 4Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 5Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250