A&O wins role alongside elite US duo on €1.75bn pharma takeover bid
Allen & Overy (A&O) is advising on a €1.75bn (£1.5bn) M&A deal which could see pharma giant Johnson & Johnson seal the takeover of Dutch vaccine maker Crucell. Johnson & Johnson already holds an 18% stake in Crucell, but is in advanced discussions about making an all cash public offer to take ownership of the outstanding shares. A&O is leading on the Dutch side for Crucell, with a team led by Amsterdam corporate and finance of counsel Johan Kleyn, while Clearly Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton is providing US law advice to the target company with a team led by New York M&A partner Daniel Sternberg.
September 24, 2010 at 09:30 AM
2 minute read
Allen & Overy (A&O) is advising on a €1.75bn (£1.5bn) M&A deal which could see pharma giant Johnson & Johnson seal the takeover of Dutch vaccine maker Crucell.
Johnson & Johnson already holds an 18% stake in Crucell, but is in advanced discussions about making an all cash public offer to take ownership of the outstanding shares.
A&O is leading on the Dutch side for Crucell, with a team led by Amsterdam corporate and finance of counsel Johan Kleyn, while Clearly Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton is providing US law advice to the target company with a team led by New York M&A partner Daniel Sternberg.
Wall Street rival Cravath Swaine & Moore has taken the lead US role for Johnson & Johnson, fielding a team led by New York corporate partners Damien Zoubek and Robert Townsend. NautaDutilh is advising Johnson & Johnson on Dutch law with a team led by corporate partner Christiaan de Brauw.
The deal has yet to close, although the parties announced discussions last week (17 September).
One partner commented: "The deal comes as part of an uptick in the Dutch corporate market. We see in general that more deals are being prepared and my impression is that M&A in the Netherlands is really moving towards a busy period."
Crucell is a global biopharmaceutical company focused on research development, production and marketing of vaccines, proteins and antibodies that prevent or treat infectious diseases. Crucell is one of the major suppliers of vaccines to UNICEF and the developing world.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKirkland, Macfarlanes Act as Evelyn Partners Offloads £700M Professional Services Arm
2 minute readElon Musk Taps UK Top 50 Firm for London Launch of AI Business
Trending Stories
- 1'It's Not Going to Be Pretty': PayPal, Capital One Face Novel Class Actions Over 'Poaching' Commissions Owed Influencers
- 211th Circuit Rejects Trump's Emergency Request as DOJ Prepares to Release Special Counsel's Final Report
- 3Supreme Court Takes Up Challenge to ACA Task Force
- 4'Tragedy of Unspeakable Proportions:' Could Edison, DWP, Face Lawsuits Over LA Wildfires?
- 5Meta Pulls Plug on DEI Programs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250