Low-balling now common - but many think firms offer poor value for money
Nearly nine out of 10 law firms are habitually offering discounts on their headline billing rates according to new research, which casts doubt on the value for money offered by commercial law firms. The latest Big Question poll of partners found that 88% of firms are typically offering discounts on their headline rates, with 42% usually discounting by 5%-10%, while just over a third usually cut rates by 10%-20%. One in 10 respondents said that their firms were regularly discounting headline rates by 20%-30% while 12% said their firms generally avoided discounting.
October 06, 2010 at 04:29 AM
4 minute read
Nearly nine out of 10 law firms are habitually offering discounts on their headline billing rates according to new research, which casts doubt on the value for money offered by commercial law firms.
The latest Big Question poll of partners found that 88% of firms are typically offering discounts on their headline rates, with 42% usually discounting by 5%-10%, while just over a third usually cut rates by 10%-20%. One in 10 respondents said that their firms were regularly discounting headline rates by 20%-30% while 12% said their firms generally avoided discounting.
The survey also found that partners have a surprisingly jaded view of the value for money of their own services, with nearly half (46%) arguing that the charge-out rates of major firms are either 'poor value' or 'could be better'. Twenty-six percent thought law firms offered 'good' or 'excellent' value, while one in four viewed pricing as merely 'OK'.
The findings suggest that the downturn is continuing to impact substantially on rates. Asked which band best describes hourly charge-out rates for UK partners at their firm, nearly half said 'up to £450′. Thirty-one percent cited the £450-£550 band, while 20% put it at £550-£650. Only one respondent put the rates in the region of £650-£750.
The results also suggest that the perception of charge-out rates at top-tier firms may be higher than the reality. Asked to gauge their view of partner charge-out rates at such firms, 43% said £650-£750, while a further 5% said 'more than £750′.
Clyde & Co chief executive Peter Hasson said: "Pricing for partners is the most competitive band at the moment and is the area that clients tend to mostly focus on. Hourly rates are still the most typical for our big-ticket litigation work, although we have also seen conditional fees increasing, and fixed fees are also commonly used in our transactional work."
Meanwhile, 42% of respondents said that charge-out rates for mid-level associates at their firms were up to £300 an hour, followed by 35% who said that they were between £300 and £350.
Nearly half of all participants stated their firms charged between £200 and £250 an hour for junior assistants, with 2% suggesting a much higher price of between £350 and £400.
Hogan Lovells finance partner Penny Angell said: "There is no one grading of lawyers that has particularly suffered a hit in terms of how much clients will pay for them but, for banking panels especially, there is often now a fixed price that they will pay for a lawyer at each level.
"It is definitely the case that clients are looking for alternative ways of charging and the transactional banking market is mostly working on an effective fixed-fee basis now, which I think will continue."
The idea of fixed fees was flagged by Berwin Leighton Paisner corporate finance partner Patrick Somers, who commented: "We use hourly rates as one of a number of internal financial measures. It is now very rare for us to work on an hourly-rate basis. Hourly rates do not encourage efficient working practices."
Ashurst head of corporate Stephen Lloyd said: "There is much more focus on abort fees, caps and other flexible deal structures, so in a sense charge-out rates are less relevant than before – they are really a management tool to help in pricing jobs correctly.
"I don't think there has been very significant movement in rates or recovery yet, although it is possible to detect a marginal improvement as confidence returns."
Partners on charge-out rates
- 88% of firms typically discount their rates
- 79% of partners charge £550 an hour or less
- 46% have a negative view of the value of law firms
- 25% of firms charge out mid-level associates at more than £350 an hour
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![DeepSeek and the AI Revolution: Why One Legal Tech Expert Is Hitting Pause DeepSeek and the AI Revolution: Why One Legal Tech Expert Is Hitting Pause](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/4a/f6/62f476814a4bbe57b17e0afd2bdd/deepseek-app-4-767x633.jpg)
DeepSeek and the AI Revolution: Why One Legal Tech Expert Is Hitting Pause
4 minute read![What Happens When a Lateral Partner's Guaranteed Compensation Ends? What Happens When a Lateral Partner's Guaranteed Compensation Ends?](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/9c/47/f55d72654a2f9fc53f8bd33ff307/business-handshake-767x633.jpg)
What Happens When a Lateral Partner's Guaranteed Compensation Ends?
![Lawyers React To India’s 2025 Budget, Welcome Investment And Tax Reform Lawyers React To India’s 2025 Budget, Welcome Investment And Tax Reform](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2024/08/Indian-Flag-767x633.jpg)
Lawyers React To India’s 2025 Budget, Welcome Investment And Tax Reform
![Russia’s Legal Sector Is Changing as Western Sanctions Take Their Toll Russia’s Legal Sector Is Changing as Western Sanctions Take Their Toll](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2023/04/Moscow-Russia-767x633.jpg)
Russia’s Legal Sector Is Changing as Western Sanctions Take Their Toll
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 2States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 3Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 4Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 5Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250