Competition lawyers gear up for merger of OFT and Competition Commission
Competition lawyers are gearing up for the biggest shake-up in the UK's antitrust regime for years following confirmation today (14 October) that the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) and the Competition Commission (CC) are set to merge. The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) announced the move as part of the new coalition Government's move to streamline the work of public bodies - a policy dubbed 'the bonfire of the quangos'.
October 14, 2010 at 07:21 AM
4 minute read
Competition lawyers are gearing up for the biggest shake-up in the UK's antitrust regime for years following confirmation today (14 October) that the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) and the Competition Commission (CC) are set to merge.
The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) announced the move as part of the new coalition Government's move to streamline the work of public bodies – a policy dubbed 'the bonfire of the quangos'.
The proposed restructuring of the two competition bodies comes after debate over whether the UK's two-tier regime was too burdensome. Businesses had expressed concerns that the CC effectively starts its investigations from scratch after a referral from the OFT.
The UK also already has a separate appeals body for antitrust matters in the form of the Competition Appeal Tribunal.
The BIS said that the new body would be responsible for merger regulation, market investigations, cartel and antitrust cases, as well as a number of functions with respect to regulated utilities, arguing this would "streamline" competition procedures.
There have been fears among some lawyers that the move could impact on the UK's reputation for maintaining a robust antitrust regime (see market reaction, below).
The OFT has already seen its spending cut by nearly 10% over the past three years. A final decision on merging the two bodies will follow a public consultation in the New Year.
The move came amid mounting speculation among competition advisers that the coalition Government was to merge the two bodies after the OFT and CC issued joint merger assessment guidelines last month.
Business Secretary Vince Cable commented: "Consumers are represented by a bewildering array of public, private and voluntary bodies, which often duplicate efforts to inform, educate and advise consumers of their rights. Our aim is to create a simpler structure with a single competition authority and a stronger role for front-line consumer services."
As part of the shake up of non-governmental public bodies, the BIS also announced plans to merge the postal regulator Postcomm with media watchdog Ofcom, and that the Financial Reporting Council will retain its independent status but no longer receive public funding.
Reaction from competition partners
Norton Rose head of antitrust Martin Coleman (pictured above): "The merger of the two bodies gives the opportunity for significant efficiencies with regards to the review process. Businesses will welcome the fact that there is a smooth flow between the initial review, traditionally executed by the OFT, and the more in-depth investigation."
"There is a risk that the merger will lead to a situation where there is less objectivity in the second phase investigation process, but if there are proper safeguards in place to make sure that this doesn't happen, it should not present a problem."
Hogan Lovells competition partner Lesley Ainsworth: "At a time when public authorities are under pressure to make savings, a marriage between the OFT and CC would appear to be sound. Although given that their combined budget is below £100m, the scope for major cost savings is unlikely to be great."
Linklaters competition partner Alec Burnside: "The argument for a merger has some force, although there is a danger here of the baby being thrown out with the bath water. The two-tier system has commanded respect internationally and there is weight in the argument for a 'fresh pair of eyes'.
"However, there may be other ways of ensuring the right checks and balances, and lessons can be learnt from the structures used in other countries."
CMS Cameron McKenna competition partner David Marks: "There has always been an element of duplication between the two bodies, and anything which shortens the procedure is to be welcomed."
"But there are detriments: the CC had the great virtue of bringing a fresh pair of eyes, detachment and reliability to the investigatory process.
"The OFT is making the first review to compressed timetables, whereas the CC has the capacity to make an in-depth review of the most complex cases. Squeezing them together may mean replacing a Rolls Royce service with a Mondeo."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWalmart Ordered to End ‘Abusive Practices’ By Mexican Antitrust Authority
O'Melveny Secures Global Clearances as Korean Air-Asiana Merger is Finally Completed
Big Law Firms Help Vodafone-Three Merger Clear Major Competition Hurdle
Canada’s Antitrust Watchdog Sues Google For Billions Over Ad Practices
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250