Competition lawyers gear up for merger of OFT and Competition Commission
Competition lawyers are gearing up for the biggest shake-up in the UK's antitrust regime for years following confirmation today (14 October) that the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) and the Competition Commission (CC) are set to merge. The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) announced the move as part of the new coalition Government's move to streamline the work of public bodies - a policy dubbed 'the bonfire of the quangos'.
October 14, 2010 at 07:21 AM
4 minute read
Competition lawyers are gearing up for the biggest shake-up in the UK's antitrust regime for years following confirmation today (14 October) that the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) and the Competition Commission (CC) are set to merge.
The Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) announced the move as part of the new coalition Government's move to streamline the work of public bodies – a policy dubbed 'the bonfire of the quangos'.
The proposed restructuring of the two competition bodies comes after debate over whether the UK's two-tier regime was too burdensome. Businesses had expressed concerns that the CC effectively starts its investigations from scratch after a referral from the OFT.
The UK also already has a separate appeals body for antitrust matters in the form of the Competition Appeal Tribunal.
The BIS said that the new body would be responsible for merger regulation, market investigations, cartel and antitrust cases, as well as a number of functions with respect to regulated utilities, arguing this would "streamline" competition procedures.
There have been fears among some lawyers that the move could impact on the UK's reputation for maintaining a robust antitrust regime (see market reaction, below).
The OFT has already seen its spending cut by nearly 10% over the past three years. A final decision on merging the two bodies will follow a public consultation in the New Year.
The move came amid mounting speculation among competition advisers that the coalition Government was to merge the two bodies after the OFT and CC issued joint merger assessment guidelines last month.
Business Secretary Vince Cable commented: "Consumers are represented by a bewildering array of public, private and voluntary bodies, which often duplicate efforts to inform, educate and advise consumers of their rights. Our aim is to create a simpler structure with a single competition authority and a stronger role for front-line consumer services."
As part of the shake up of non-governmental public bodies, the BIS also announced plans to merge the postal regulator Postcomm with media watchdog Ofcom, and that the Financial Reporting Council will retain its independent status but no longer receive public funding.
Reaction from competition partners
Norton Rose head of antitrust Martin Coleman (pictured above): "The merger of the two bodies gives the opportunity for significant efficiencies with regards to the review process. Businesses will welcome the fact that there is a smooth flow between the initial review, traditionally executed by the OFT, and the more in-depth investigation."
"There is a risk that the merger will lead to a situation where there is less objectivity in the second phase investigation process, but if there are proper safeguards in place to make sure that this doesn't happen, it should not present a problem."
Hogan Lovells competition partner Lesley Ainsworth: "At a time when public authorities are under pressure to make savings, a marriage between the OFT and CC would appear to be sound. Although given that their combined budget is below £100m, the scope for major cost savings is unlikely to be great."
Linklaters competition partner Alec Burnside: "The argument for a merger has some force, although there is a danger here of the baby being thrown out with the bath water. The two-tier system has commanded respect internationally and there is weight in the argument for a 'fresh pair of eyes'.
"However, there may be other ways of ensuring the right checks and balances, and lessons can be learnt from the structures used in other countries."
CMS Cameron McKenna competition partner David Marks: "There has always been an element of duplication between the two bodies, and anything which shortens the procedure is to be welcomed."
"But there are detriments: the CC had the great virtue of bringing a fresh pair of eyes, detachment and reliability to the investigatory process.
"The OFT is making the first review to compressed timetables, whereas the CC has the capacity to make an in-depth review of the most complex cases. Squeezing them together may mean replacing a Rolls Royce service with a Mondeo."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPerkins Coie Builds in London With Ex-Norton Rose Fulbright Brussels Head
2 minute readCombative Arguments at EU's Highest Court Over Google's €4.13B Antitrust Fine Emphasize High Stakes and Invoke Trump
4 minute read‘Raises More Questions Than Answers’: Partners Puzzled by Leadership Change at UK Competition Regulator
CMA Uses New Competition Powers to Investigate Google Over Search Advertising
Trending Stories
- 1ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 2States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 3Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 4Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 5Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250