Charles Russell mulls merger options as firm reviews partnership structure
Charles Russell is set to overhaul its partnership and restructure around industry sectors as part of a comprehensive review that also sees the firm setting its sights on a UK merger. The UK top 50 firm has drawn up a new three-year plan to take it through 2013, with a UK merger forming a key plank of the strategy. Failing this, the firm's management hopes to grow in London through bolting on team hires. It has already explored mergers with a number of firms in recent years, including at least one in the top 50.
November 02, 2010 at 02:26 AM
2 minute read
Top 50 firm reviews strategy with UK merger high on agenda
Charles Russell is set to overhaul its partnership and restructure around industry sectors as part of a comprehensive review that also sees the firm setting its sights on a UK merger.
The UK top 50 firm has drawn up a new three-year plan to take it through 2013, with a UK merger forming a key plank of the strategy. Failing this, the firm's management hopes to grow in London through bolting on team hires. It has already explored mergers with a number of firms in recent years, including at least one in the top 50.
Other parts of the review see Charles Russell moving away from practice groups to sector lines. As part of this, the firm has increased the number of sectors it covers from four to nine – adding energy and natural resources; family; private wealth; retail, design and leisure; and property – with leaders for each sector still to be decided.
These sectors sit alongside the existing charities and not-for-profit; healthcare; sport; and technology and communications focuses.
Charles Russell is also considering scrapping its salaried partner rank and moving to a two-tier structure, comprising fixed-share and equity partners. The move is being discussed by a board sub-committee and would affect 37 salaried partners.
The board is also looking at how to retain lawyers after age 60, the current exit age for equity partners. It wants to make it easier for older lawyers to stay on either as fixed-share partners or consultants.
Charles Russell managing partner James Holder (pictured) commented: "This is by far one of our most comprehensive strategic reviews. We are looking at opportunities to achieve our strategic objectives and part of that is to be aware of what is out there – including merger potentials or growth through bolt-ons."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAshurst Beijing Chief Representative Leaves for New York Boutique Sterlington
Baker McKenzie, Norton Rose & Other Top Litigators Foresee Rise in AI, Data & ESG Disputes
Axiom-Ince: SFO Charges Five, Including Former Head, Following Investigation
3 minute readSDT Upholds SLAPP Claim Against Osborne Clarke Partner Advising Nadhim Zahawi
3 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250