Hogan Lovells announces associate redundancies in London tax team
Hogan Lovells has lauched a redundancy consultation in its London tax practice, with four associate positions at risk. The consultation, which is being led by tax partner Karen Hughes, started in early November, and will see a number of the group's associates assessed based on current and expected work levels as well as personal performance. Hogan Lovells' London tax practice currently has five partners and 14 associates. It works with clients including Barclays, ExxonMobil and Ford.
November 19, 2010 at 12:45 PM
2 minute read
Hogan Lovells has lauched a redundancy consultation in its London tax practice, with four associate positions at risk.
The consultation, which is being led by tax partner Karen Hughes, started in early November, and will see a number of the group's associates assessed based on current and expected work levels as well as personal performance.
Hogan Lovells' London tax practice, which currently has five partners and 14 associates, works with clients including Barclays, ExxonMobil and Ford.
The job cuts come after the firm made four redundancies in its real estate practice earlier this year, following a consultation which began in July. Three senior associates were laid off, with another taking voluntary redundancy.
Legacy Lovells made its last round of London layoffs in April 2009, when 79 legal and support staff left the firm. That redundancy consultation had kicked off at the beginning of February, with a total of 96 jobs reviewed.
Earlier today Barlow Lyde & Gilbert confirmed that three partners from its corporate and commercial group have been asked to leave alongside a handful of associates. Meanwhile Osborne Clarke (OC) yesterday (18 November) announced that it is to lay off up to five real estate lawyers in its UK offices.
Eversheds launched its fifth round of redundancies in two years in August, with up to 100 roles placed under review as the firm prepared to outsource back office functions to Accenture. The cuts came in the national firm's finance and human resources departments across its Birmingham, Cardiff and Leeds offices.
- Click here for Legal Week's feature on the post-merger challenges ahead for Hogan Lovells.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Cox & Palmer to Merge with Benson Buffett in St. John’s, Canada’s Easternmost City
2 minute read
Asia's Top Stories 2024: Departures, Layoffs and Breakups at the Likes of Kirkland, Skadden and Mayer Brown
A&O Shearman’s South African Lawyers in Last-minute Talks To Find Jobs Before Closure
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
