Olswang accounts reveal extent of debt reduction and headcount cutbacks
Olswang reduced its net debt by more than 20% during the last financial year, according to the firm's first limited liability partnership (LLP) filings. The UK top 50 firm saw total debt drop from just under £13.5m in 2009 down to just under £10.5m for the year ending 30 April 2010, according to filings with Companies House, with cash in hand and at the bank increasing to £4.7m, up from £337,000 the previous year. The filings also show that Oslwang reduced its professional and administrative staff headcount by nearly 11% over the year, with total staff numbers dropping from 542 to 484 as a result of cost-saving measures, with staff costs falling from £36.3m to £31.5m as a result.
November 19, 2010 at 08:53 AM
2 minute read
Olswang reduced its net debt by more than 20% during the last financial year, according to the firm's first limited liability partnership (LLP) filings.
The UK top 50 firm saw total debt drop from just under £13.5m in 2009 down to just under £10.5m for the year ending 30 April 2010, according to filings with Companies House, with cash in hand and at the bank increasing to £4.7m, up from £337,000 the previous year.
The filings also show that Olswang reduced its professional and administrative staff headcount by nearly 11% over the year, with total staff numbers dropping from 542 to 484 as a result of cost-saving measures, with staff costs falling from £36.3m to £31.5m as a result.
The average number of equity members remained almost static at 97 compared to 100 the previous year.
Olswang managing partner David Stewart (pictured) told Legal Week that cash in hand increased partly as a result of the firm taking 14 months to distribute profits at the end of the 2008-09 financial year rather than 12.
He said: "The reduction in our net debt comes as a result of better management of our work in process and better financial discipline. We expect the reduction to continue."
In June Olswang reported a 38% increase in profits per equity partner to £420,000 for 2009-10, while turnover increased by 2% to £91m.
The news comes after the firm recently posted a dip in revenues for the first half of 2010-11 to £43.3m.The drop marks a 3% decrease on the same period in 2009-10, when the firm posted fee income of £44.7m.
Stewart said that internationally the firm had performed very well, with its German and Belgium offices experiencing growth of 151% compared to the same period last year.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSimpson Thacher, Kirkland and Latham Maintain Lead in UK Revenue Per Lawyer Rankings
US Firms Rising? The Law Firms with the Largest UK Market Share, 2024
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250