The future of the Bar: Inner court to outer reaches
The modern day barrister is as likely to be boarding an aeroplane at Heathrow to represent a client in the Middle East or the Caribbean as he or she is to be catching the Eurostar to appear in the European Court of Justice, or indeed walking down to the local courts to appear as an advocate in a trial in England and Wales. Similarly, a barrister advising his or her client as to the risks involved in a proposed business endeavour, or in relation to a child abduction case, is as likely to be providing that advice in a conference in London or Cardiff, be sending the advice by email or participating in a video link-up with Moscow or Singapore.
November 26, 2010 at 07:26 AM
5 minute read
Barristers' specialist advocacy skills have seen the Bar extend its remit far beyond traditional national limits, says Chantal-Aimee Doerries QC
The modern day barrister is as likely to be boarding an aeroplane at Heathrow to represent a client in the Middle East or the Caribbean as he or she is to be catching the Eurostar to appear in the European Court of Justice, or indeed walking down to the local courts to appear as an advocate in a trial in England and Wales.
Similarly, a barrister advising his or her client as to the risks involved in a proposed business endeavour, or in relation to a child abduction case, is as likely to be providing that advice in a conference in London or Cardiff, be sending the advice by email or participating in a video link-up with Moscow or Singapore.
These changes are, of course, not unique to the Bar, or even the legal world, but barristers are able to offer a particular skill – that of the independent specialist advocate. Most modern barristers are both specialists as experienced advocates and as experts in a particular area of the law.
International work for the Bar is not new, but it has changed. It is no longer purely the preserve of the senior end of the profession. Increasingly, junior barristers are playing an important role, whether as members of a team preparing a case, as advocates in international arbitration, or on secondment to a law firm.
The market has become much wider in geographical terms. The Commonwealth remains a central aspect of the international work, but as borders have largely ceased to be a barrier to international business, so the opportunities have increased for the Bar.
These opportunities extend from advising foreign companies investing in the UK which need advice on the domestic legal system to representing parties investing in or buying from emerging markets which do not yet have an experienced legal market.
Criminal element
It would also be wrong to assume that these opportunities arise only in the commercial world. Criminal barristers have for some time been a regular feature as advocates at the International Criminal Court and at international war crimes and crimes against humanity tribunals.
The recent financial fall-out has opened further doors, with overseas clients increasingly looking to the criminal Bar to advise on regulatory matters and cross-border fraud. The pressures facing the publicly-funded Bar has encouraged the criminal Bar to look increasingly overseas, where the expertise of such advocates is in high demand.
An example of a relatively new market for the Bar is the Commonwealth of Independent States. In a part of this area, Russia, an increasing number of commercial contracts provide for English law as the applicable law and/or English Courts as the dispute resolution forum.
This has generated work for barristers as advocates, in arbitrations and the English court, and as experts or advisers in relation to disputes heard in Russian courts. One of the advantages of the Bar for overseas lawyers is the ability to tap into the knowledge and expertise offered without losing control of the case.
There is no doubt that the electronic world in which we live has made the Bar much more approachable and accessible, a trend that increasingly attracts overseas clients and lawyers to the Bar. So there is no reason why an Asian shipbuilder in dispute with a European oil and gas company can't obtain advice from a specialist barrister on the likely outcome of any dispute and the options going forward.
Making contact
Sometimes the route into the market is less direct. For example, in China, still a relatively new dispute resolution market, the hard work of barristers over the last 20 years as part of the Lord Chancellor's Training Scheme for Chinese lawyers is paying dividends. Relationships built while talented young Chinese lawyers were seconded to chambers for three months has helped the Bar understand the Chinese market better and has led to opportunities in terms of work and contacts.
Contacts made through such educational schemes and links which many Asian lawyers have through the Inns of Court are proving invaluable in helping the Bar in markets which are otherwise not always the easiest for foreign service providers to break into.
The flexibility offered by barristers is something that the market, whether domestic or international, seems to like. Barristers are often instructed by solicitors on behalf of the client and are able to act as part of the team in this capacity, leading the advocacy or advising on a case.
Equally, they are increasingly instructed by overseas lawyers and clients directly – sometimes to provide advice on a particular issue, and sometimes to act as part of team in an arbitration.
The Bar, as a specialist profession, retains the ability to make a unique contribution in advocacy and advisory work in jurisdictions around the world. Its future is bright.
Chantal-Aimee Doerries QC is vice chair of the Bar Council's international committee and is a barrister at Atkin Chambers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllIs KPMG’s Arizona ABS Strategy a Turning Point in U.S. Law? What London’s Experience Reveals
5 minute readKPMG Moves to Provide Legal Services in the US—Now All Eyes Are on Its Big Four Peers
International Arbitration: Key Developments of 2024 and Emerging Trends for 2025
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1South Florida Attorney Charged With Aggravated Battery After Incident in Prime Rib Line
- 2'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 3Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 4‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 5State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250