SRA set to review LPO regulation in wake of recent outsourcing deals
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is gearing up to carry out a review of legal process outsourcing (LPO), as the number of firms using external outsourcing companies for legal work increases. The body is considering conducting a "thematic review" to identify issues or risks that warrant regulatory changes or additional supervision. The prime focus for the SRA is to ensure that outsourcing legal work to an external provider does not absolve the law firm of responsibility for the matter outsourced.
November 30, 2010 at 06:44 AM
3 minute read
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is gearing up to carry out a review of legal process outsourcing (LPO), as the number of firms using external outsourcing companies for legal work increases.
The body is considering conducting a "thematic review" to identify issues or risks that warrant regulatory changes or additional supervision. The prime focus for the SRA is to ensure that outsourcing legal work to an external provider does not absolve the law firm of responsibility for the matter outsourced.
A spokesperson for the SRA said: "Although we have not made any final decision, [LPO] is such a growing and fast-developing issue that we may undertake a thematic review next year to identify whether there are any particular issues or risks that require changes to our current regulatory requirements or whether certain outsourcing arrangements need particular attention in the supervision process."
The review comes as the regulator looks at LPO as part of its consultation on the latest draft of its handbook, which is due to be launched in April next year.
In the current version of the handbook the SRA states in chapter four that outsourcing should only be undertaken when the delegator is "satisfied that the provider has taken all appropriate steps to ensure clients' confidential information will be protected".
Additionally, the handbook states that outsourcing must not "jeopardise the quality of legal activities nor impair the quality of internal controls" or "impact on the SRA's ability to monitor compliance with all obligations in the handbook".
Last month CMS Cameron McKenna partners gave their seal of approval to plans to outsource the firm's back-office support departments to Integreon, while Herbert Smith last week opted to set up its own office in Belfast to handle volume disputes work rather than using an external LPO.
The news comes as the SRA today (30 November) also set out further details outlining how it intends to deliver outcomes-focused regulation and use risk-based regulation to implement the guidelines included in its new handbook due out next year.
The regulator wants to focus its efforts on identifying risks before they happen rather than penalising firms or individuals after they have breached prescriptive rules.
SRA chief executive Antony Townsend said: "We remain firmly on target to become an outcomes-focused regulator by October next year. This paper sets out clearly how the SRA is approaching the task and what this will mean for consumers and law firms."
For more, see:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhistleblowing in 2025: What's on the Horizon for GCs?
De Brauw Partner Departs for In-House Role with Swiss Family Enterprise
Trending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250