'Solicitors are boring' and other interview fails
I hate interviewing. Actually, that's not true - a lot of the time I find interviews interesting and stimulating. But some candidates, especially for paralegal positions, make it really hard... So, as a service to aspiring lawyers everywhere, here are my top tips for making your interview less of an ordeal for your interviewer. All examples are true fact.
December 15, 2010 at 10:53 AM
4 minute read
I hate interviewing. Actually, that's not true – a lot of the time I find interviews interesting and stimulating. But some candidates, especially for paralegal positions, make it really hard…
So, as a service to aspiring lawyers everywhere, here are my top tips for making your interview less of an ordeal for your interviewer. All examples are true fact.
1. Turn up. Or at least, y'know, let me know if you're not going to. If you don't, it's just me on my own in a meeting room. Waiting. Looking at my watch. And waiting some more.
You might think it's no thing, not turning up for somebody that you'll never see again (or even for the first time). But think: I'm a potential client or boss or opponent. And all that waiting, and the extra hour of work I have to put in the evening to make up for the time I spent waiting? I will remember it.
2. If you do turn up, try to look and act like a potential lawyer. Don't flash me. Don't come straight from the gym, bright red and carrying an enormous kit bag. And for God's sake, don't dribble.
And what's with the cloud of perfume/aftershave? I admit that '"not smelling bad' is somewhere on my candidate checklist, but really, I'm not going to hire someone that I'm allergic to.
3. Try to have a clue. For example, when I ask you about your career plans, know the difference between barristers and solicitors.
4. Understand who you're speaking to. In particular, if you're explaining why you ultimately want to be a barrister, you may wish to avoid saying that it's because "solicitors are boring".
Also, if you find that I'm less than attentive to your detailed account of the six months you spent interning in a family law firm, that's because I'M INTERVIEWING YOU FOR A JOB IN COMMERCIAL LAW.
5. Don't get angry. Ok, when you asked before the interview whether you need to prepare anything specific, we said no. And yes, we've asked you about some actual law. But it really doesn't help you to present your best self if you get in a huff about it. In the interview. With the general counsel.
6. No really, try to have a clue. When I ask you about the legal aspects of your current job in pre-litigation debt recovery, reporting to the company solicitor, it's quite likely that I'm not looking for the answer "there aren't any really".
7. Don't be needy. If you don't get the position, don't call to tell me plaintively that you really are the right person for the job. You already had the chance to tell me that, and I decided that you're not. Now it's just the equivalent of a football player trying to get the ref to take back the red card. And have you ever seen a referee do that?
All of the foregoing is entertaining, and no-one who's serious about becoming a lawyer will make those mistakes. But plenty of good candidates don't convince in person, so here's my one big genuine interview tip:
8. Bring your A-game. You can be nervous, you can take your time, you can even stutter. But you need to be able to have a discussion about the law and about business, and that means that you need to be switched on and that you need to think on your feet.
That isn't about experience or age. I'll cut my questions to the cloth of the candidates, so I don't ask paralegals about hard law or commercial conundrums. You just need to be able to see the law at work in your life as it is now, and to be able to talk about that and connect it to the position that you're applying for. If you can do that, you're a lawyer already.
Legal Bizzle is an in-house lawyer who blogs at The Bizzle. Click here to follow Legal Bizzle on Twitter.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLatham's magic circle strikes, pay rises and EY's legal takeover: the best of Legal Week over the last few weeks
3 minute readJob losses, soaring partner profits and Freshfields exits - the best of Legal Week over the past two weeks
3 minute readMagic circle PEP hikes, the associate pay conundrum and more #MeToo - the best of Legal Week last week
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'True Leadership Is About Putting Others First': 2024 In-House Award Winners Inspired, Took Road Less Traveled
- 2A Q&A with Sidley Austin's London Leader
- 3New York-Based Harris Beach Combines With Connecticut-Based Murtha Cullina, Forming NE Powerhouse
- 4New Year, New Am Law 100: Challenges Await These Newly Merged Law Firms
- 5Thursday Newspaper
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250