Leading law firms consider retirement policy shake-up
A host of leading UK law firms are set to overhaul their retirement policies for partners and employees. Top 30 law firms including Allen & Overy (A&O), Norton Rose, Wragge & Co, Holman Fenwick Willan, Beachcroft, Stephenson Harwood and Field Fisher Waterhouse are currently considering changing their retirement provisions for partners to bring them in line with incoming legislation.
January 12, 2011 at 07:49 PM
3 minute read
End of default retirement age spurs top law firms to review policies
A host of leading UK law firms are set to overhaul their retirement policies for partners and employees.
Top 30 law firms including Allen & Overy (A&O), Norton Rose, Wragge & Co, Holman Fenwick Willan, Beachcroft, Stephenson Harwood and Field Fisher Waterhouse are currently considering changing their retirement provisions for partners to bring them in line with incoming legislation.
For most firms, discussions are focusing on whether to either raise the age of retirement in the partnership deed or remove it altogether, with others looking at broader retirement policies. Norton Rose, for example, is considering services that could be offered to older partners keen to stay on at the firm in some other capacity.
Norton Rose chairman Stephen Parish (pictured) said: "Those days when City partners were expected to retire when they had passed 50 are over and people now see that older partners also have something to offer. It could be winding down fee earning and moving into things like knowledge management, business development or compliance."
Firms including Ashurst and legacy Hammonds and Lovells have already made changes to their retirement provisions either in preparation for, or in the wake of, age discrimination laws introduced in the UK in 2006. However, the issue has been brought back to the fore because of the upcoming abolition of the default retirement age of 65 for UK employees, which comes into effect in October this year, and a closely-watched case involving lawyer Leslie Seldon.
Seldon, a partner at Clarkson Wright & Jakes, argued that a compulsory retirement age of 65 constituted age discrimination but lost his case in the Court of Appeal last summer. Firms are now waiting to see if a Supreme Court hearing goes ahead.
Partnership adviser Ronnie Fox said: "Many law firms have so far made only half-hearted attempts to address the retirement age of partners. Now that the Seldon case is likely to go all the way to the Supreme Court and the default retirement age for employees is to be abolished, firms are finally reviewing their partnership deeds and employee retirement issues. The topic has been taken off the back burner and placed firmly on the agenda."
Additional reporting by Sofia Lind.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAshurst Beijing Chief Representative Leaves for New York Boutique Sterlington
Baker McKenzie, Norton Rose & Other Top Litigators Foresee Rise in AI, Data & ESG Disputes
Axiom-Ince: SFO Charges Five, Including Former Head, Following Investigation
3 minute readSDT Upholds SLAPP Claim Against Osborne Clarke Partner Advising Nadhim Zahawi
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250