Norton Rose shifts trainee intake dates and confirms retention rates
Norton Rose is to change the cycle of its trainee intake from January to May, as the City firm announces its latest retention figures for qualifying trainees. This year the top 10 City law firm has had a January intake, but will also have intakes in both May and September. This will be followed in 2012 by a permanent change to intakes in May and September.
January 14, 2011 at 10:01 AM
2 minute read
Norton Rose is to change the cycle of its trainee intake from January to May, as the City firm announces its latest retention figures for qualifying trainees.
This year the top 10 City law firm has had a January intake, but will also have intakes in both May and September. This will be followed in 2012 by a permanent change to intakes in May and September.
The firm said the shift comes in response to trainees' education schedule. Head of human resources Lak Purewal said: "Norton Rose is changing the cycle of trainee intakes. During their contracts, our trainees rotate through six four-month seats. In addition, they are all taking the accelerated Legal Practice Course (LPC) as part of our participation in the City LPC consortium's training course at BPP Law School.
"May and September are now the most appropriate start dates for our seat cycle rotation following the results from the two waves of [LPC] courses."
The news comes as Norton Rose finalised its retention rates for its January 2011 round of qualifying trainees. The firm has retained 26 out of 30 newly-qualified solicitors (NQs), equating to 87%.
The result is above the final retention rate at the firm both in September and January last year. Out of September qualifiers, the firm kept on 24 out of 29 (83%), while in January 2010 the number was slightly lower, at 72%, as 21 out of 29 gained an associate position with the firm.
In all of the last three qualifying rounds the firm has seen a 100% acceptance rate to the job offers made.
The news follows reported retention rates from firms including Allen & Overy, which will keep on 88% of its trainees due to qualify in March, and Nabarro, which will retain 85% of its trainees that qualify in January.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Wickard AI Partners With Law School to Bring Legal AI Training to Ethiopia Wickard AI Partners With Law School to Bring Legal AI Training to Ethiopia](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2024/10/View-of-Addis-Ababa-in-Ethiopia-767x633.jpg)
Wickard AI Partners With Law School to Bring Legal AI Training to Ethiopia
![What Firms in Australia Are Doing to Attract and Retain Lawyers in a Competitive Market What Firms in Australia Are Doing to Attract and Retain Lawyers in a Competitive Market](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2024/06/Employee-Retention-1-767x633.jpg)
What Firms in Australia Are Doing to Attract and Retain Lawyers in a Competitive Market
7 minute read![Report: Toronto Law Students Did Not Breach School's Code of Conduct With Pro-Palestinian Letter Report: Toronto Law Students Did Not Breach School's Code of Conduct With Pro-Palestinian Letter](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2024/05/Israel-Palestine-Toronto-Protest-767x633-2.jpg)
Report: Toronto Law Students Did Not Breach School's Code of Conduct With Pro-Palestinian Letter
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Federal Laws Also Preempt State's Swipe Fee Law on Out-of-State Banks, Judge Rules
- 2Judge Grills DOJ on Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Executive Order
- 3Exceptional Growth Becoming the Rule? Demand and Rate Hikes Drove Strong Year for Big Law
- 4Dentons Taps D.C. Capital Markets Attorney for New US Managing Partner
- 5Auto Dealers Ask Court to Pump the Brakes on Scout Motors’ Florida Sales
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250