Taylor Wessing LLPs reveal reductions in staff costs and headcount
Taylor Wessing cut staff costs by 17% during the last financial year after reducing staff headcount at the firm. The Anglo-German firm's UK limited liability partnership (LLP) accounts for 2009-10 show a drop in total staff costs from £37.4m to £31m. This comes against a 12% reduction in headcount, with total staff numbers dropping from 541 to 476. Support staff numbers fell from 262 to 227 - a drop of 13%. Meanwhile, fee earner numbers dipped by 9% from 258 to 235.
January 28, 2011 at 11:21 AM
2 minute read
Taylor Wessing cut staff costs by 17% during the last financial year after reducing staff headcount at the firm.
The Anglo-German firm's UK limited liability partnership (LLP) accounts for 2009-10 show a drop in total staff costs from £37.4m to £31m. This comes against a 12% reduction in headcount, with total staff numbers dropping from 541 to 476.
Support staff numbers fell from 262 to 227 – a drop of 13%. Meanwhile, fee earner numbers dipped by 9% from 258 to 235.
Turnover for the firm's UK LLP stood at £84.5m, down by 7.3% from the previous year, with profits retained for discretionary division among members increasing marginally from £19.3m in 2008-09 to £20.5m in 2009-10. The firm said this was because of savings on expenses, with operating expenses falling from £61m to £55m as a result of negotiating new contracts with suppliers as well as reducing staff costs.
The accounts also show the firm's highest-paid member made £585,744 last year compared with £526,750 the previous year. Average profits per equity partner stood at £452,900.
The accounts also show that the firm improved its cash situation in 2009-10, with its net deficit more than halving from £13.7m to £6.6m. Capital expenditure and financial investment was also significantly smaller in 2009-10 compared with the previous year, dropping from £19.8m to £623,000.
Taylor Wessing's 2008-09 accounts had shown the firm spent £31m on its new City headquarters during that financial year, taking out a £20m bank loan to help finance this. The latest accounts show the loan facility stood at £13m on 30 April 2010, reducing to £5m by July that year. The firm expects it to be paid off by September.
Taylor Wessing finance director Charlotte Beckett said: "It was a good year for the firm in a difficult economic climate. The firm was able to control costs in a number of ways, in particular by working with staff through our holiday purchase scheme and careful management of headcount, which meant the firm continued to grow its profitability."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSimpson Thacher, Kirkland and Latham Maintain Lead in UK Revenue Per Lawyer Rankings
US Firms Rising? The Law Firms with the Largest UK Market Share, 2024
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250