Halliwells administrators report reveals debts of more than £190m
Defunct law firm Halliwells owes unsecured creditors more than £190m, according to the latest report from administrators BDO. To date BDO has received claims worth £191.5m from unsecured creditors. Landlord and lease creditors account for £182.2m of claims received to date, with HM Revenue & Customs the next largest creditor with some £4.3m in taxes and £1.1m in VAT.
February 15, 2011 at 08:13 AM
2 minute read
Defunct law firm Halliwells owes unsecured creditors more than £190m, according to the latest report from administrators BDO.
To date BDO has received claims worth £191.5m from unsecured creditors. Landlord and lease creditors account for £182.2m of claims received to date, with HM Revenue & Customs the next largest creditor with some £4.3m in taxes and £1.1m in VAT.
The debt figure is significantly higher than the £14.1m originally thought to be owed to unsecured creditors. At that point HM Revenue & Customs was identified as the largest of the non-preferential creditors.
BDO's report, drawn up by BDO partners and joint administrators Dermot Power and Shay Bannon and dated 11 February, shows £176.5m is owed to landlord creditors while lease creditors are claiming £5.7m.
The figure takes into account the remaining term of all leases on the firm's former offices in Manchester, Liverpool, London and Sheffield.
The report also shows that the administrators have run up fees of £805,487 for 3,847 hours of work at an average rate of £209.36 each hour. Of these fees, £524,354 were approved for pre-appointment costs, while £364,475.85 have been approved in connection with post-appointment work between 20 July 2010 and 15 October 2010.
A total of £384,756 relates to expenses incurred by the administrators on legal fees. An additional £606,082 has been paid in pre-appointment legal fees.
Other information contained within the report includes a breakdown of how much Hill Dickinson, Kennedys Law, Barlow Lyde & Gilbert and HBJ Gateley Wareing have paid to date for their acquisitions of parts of Halliwells. So far the firms have paid £4.3m of the £7.4m agreed.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCleary vs. White & Case: NYC Showdown Over $5 Billion Brazilian Bankruptcy
Singapore's Drew & Napier Secures $3.5B Award in Civil Suit
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250