IPO outlook - finely balanced but still tipping the wrong way
Equity capital markets (ECM) lawyers eyeing up another year of uncertainty must be wondering which will win out in 2011: irresistible force or immovable object? On one hand, you have the building pressure to tap the equity markets from the growing queue of companies that have been put off braving the market for more than two years thanks to tough market conditions. In theory, at some point issuers with solid stories for investors must accept that there will be no quick return to rosy valuations and just get on with it.
February 15, 2011 at 02:42 AM
4 minute read
The pressure to tap the market builds but the obstacles look as daunting as ever
Equity capital markets (ECM) lawyers eyeing up another year of uncertainty must be wondering which will win out in 2011: irresistible force or immovable object?
On one hand, you have the building pressure to tap the equity markets from the growing queue of companies that have been put off braving the market for more than two years thanks to tough market conditions. In theory, at some point issuers with solid stories for investors must accept that there will be no quick return to rosy valuations and just get on with it.
Yet on the other hand, the objects blocking any such progress loom as large as ever, with the market continuing to be buffeted by medium-term concerns – sovereign debt in general and the eurozone in particular – and a weak economic outlook lingering over Western economies. Throw in the political turmoil in Egypt and it's easy to see why advisers' hopes were once again dashed last week as Severstal delayed its planned flotation of NordGold – becoming the third sizeable Russian initial public offering (IPO) to be put on ice this year.
It is starting to seem like a replay of 2010, when a stream of much-touted floats either bombed in trading or were pulled altogether. Despite London's reputation as a global listing hub, partners have also noted the steady shift among issuers towards the Asia markets, with Prada's decision last month to take its IPO to Hong Kong – rather than Milan or London – being noted by many City deal professionals.
While the UK capital is widely considered an obvious home for natural resource companies – recently reinforced by the London Stock Exchange tie-up with Canada's TMX – listing in Hong Kong underscores the importance of China and other Asian markets as a major source of demand for commodities.
Given the volatility of the markets, advisers cite a renewed interest in convertible bond structures, which allow high-growth companies to give debt investors an upside in the event that the issuer secures a full IPO down the line.
Allen & Overy ECM chief Daniel Epstein comments: "Pre-IPO converts should remain a realistic option for companies with the right business and credit profile. I think we'll see a continuing trend towards the consideration of such deals, which should benefit the law firms with the strongest equity-linked franchises."
Given the relative dearth of activity, there is little surprise that a very select band of advisers are dominating what work is on hand, with Linklaters continuing to cast a long shadow. The continuing popularity for European deals to include a US placement is also playing to the hand of global firms, among them Clifford Chance, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom and Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton.
But one partner comments: "While it is primarily the Skaddens and Linklaters of this world that are servicing the underwriters on such deals, pricing tension remains enormous. This has allowed the likes of White & Case and Baker & McKenzie to muscle in."
The level of price competition is a reminder that, while conditions have improved against the lows of 2009, the going remains extremely challenging. Linklaters co-head of equities Jason Manketo comments: "The recent events in Egypt are likely to contribute to continued volatility in the broader emerging equity markets generally, although our overall sentiment, as well as that of our issuer and banking clients, continues to remain positive for IPO opportunities in 2011." For the moment, it looks like the immovable object still just about has the edge.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInternational Arbitration: Key Developments of 2024 and Emerging Trends for 2025
4 minute readThe Quiet Revolution: Private Equity’s Calculated Push Into Law Firms
5 minute read'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Adapting to AI and the Needs of Lawyers Will Be Key For Shutts & Bowen, Says Incoming Ft. Lauderdale Leader
- 2What Qualities Will Distinguish Good from Great Service In 2025?
- 3The Met Hires GC of Elite University as Next Legal Chief
- 4Not Here: Court Finds Texas Has No Jurisdiction Over Google
- 5Lawyer's Retirement Benefits Excluded From Marital Property
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250