Divorcing couples to be pushed towards mediation in MoJ court cost-cutting
Divorcing couples will be required to attend a mediation awareness session before going to court under new protocols outlined by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) yesterday (24 February). From April this year, separating spouses planning to contest the terms of their divorce in court will first be required to consider mediation, in an effort to remove the backlog of cases and reduce court costs. The move will mirror the system already in place for separating couples granted legal aid.
February 24, 2011 at 09:50 AM
3 minute read
Divorcing couples will be required to attend a mediation awareness session before going to court under new protocols outlined by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) yesterday (24 February).
From April this year, separating spouses planning to contest the terms of their divorce in court will first be required to consider mediation, in an effort to remove the backlog of cases and reduce court costs.
The move will mirror the system already in place for separating couples granted legal aid.
Justice minister Jonathan Djanogly said: "Mediation is often quicker, cheaper and less confrontational than going to court.
"Research shows it can cost a quarter of the price and take a quarter of the time of going to court, and with two thirds of publicly funded mediation already resulting in full agreement it can ensure better results for families too."
City family lawyers are broadly in agreement that the change is a good move in terms of encouraging discussion between couples, although some are concerned that it promotes a 'one size fits all' model that cannot be applied generally.
Withers family head Julian Lipson said: "Encouraging clients to have settlements out of court and in mediation is to be welcomed. In the more straightforward type of case, it is often the right choice. However, one of the main drivers for what is being proposed is to try and relieve pressure on the court system and to save money.
"The idea of people being encouraged to mediate is a very good one, but the difficulty can be that mediation doesn't work for everybody and there are often very obvious reasons why mediation won't work, for example where the two parties are not on a level playing field when it comes to being able to discuss finances."
Irwin Mitchell family partner Alison Hawes said: "Mediation is an absolutely brilliant resource, but I have concerns about trying to make one size fit all, which just cannot be applied in these kinds of cases.
"Nine out of ten of my cases are settled through negotiation anyway, and it is a little naive to think that lawyers don't exhaust every other option before taking the case to court. I also feel that generally there can be a power imbalance in couples and by forcing people to mediate you are in danger of perpetuating the vulnerability of one party."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![Singapore Litigators Shift Competitive Landscape as Another Senior Duo Sets Up Own Shop Singapore Litigators Shift Competitive Landscape as Another Senior Duo Sets Up Own Shop](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2024/05/Singapore-767x633.jpg)
Singapore Litigators Shift Competitive Landscape as Another Senior Duo Sets Up Own Shop
![Claus von Wobeser: Mexico's ‘Godfather of Arbitration’ Becomes Firm’s Honorary Chair Claus von Wobeser: Mexico's ‘Godfather of Arbitration’ Becomes Firm’s Honorary Chair](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/23/7d/d00a51c9483bb1aaba440cf7bea2/1-claus-von-wobeser-1-767x633.jpg)
Claus von Wobeser: Mexico's ‘Godfather of Arbitration’ Becomes Firm’s Honorary Chair
![Slaughter and May Leads As Government Buys Back £6 Billion of Military Homes Slaughter and May Leads As Government Buys Back £6 Billion of Military Homes](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/bb/0c/f656c49b46259f6dd418460052f5/adobestock-484641560-767x633-1.jpg)
Slaughter and May Leads As Government Buys Back £6 Billion of Military Homes
2 minute read![LatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle LatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/international-edition/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2024/03/Lateral-Hiring-767x633-2.jpg)
LatAm Moves: DLA Piper Chile, Brazil’s Demarest Build Out Disputes Muscle
Trending Stories
- 1Former NY City Hall Official Tied to Adams Corruption Probe to Plead Guilty
- 2Wilmer, White & Case, Crowell Among the Latest to Add DC Lateral Partners
- 3Advance Auto Parts Hires GC Who Climbed From Bottom to Top of Lowe's Legal Department
- 4Judge Rules Georgia Railroad Can Seize Land as Landowners Vow to Fight
- 5On the Move and After Hours: Einhorn Barbarito; Gibbons; Greenbaum Rowe; Pro Bono Partnership
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250