Simpson Thacher launches Hong Kong law practice with magic circle duo
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett has hired two partners from magic circle rivals to launch a Hong Kong law practice, writes The Asian Lawyer. Celia Lam, the joint Greater China managing partner for Linklaters, and Christopher Wong, the former head of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer's China corporate practice, will join Simpson Thacher in the autumn.
May 03, 2011 at 05:08 AM
3 minute read
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett has hired two partners from magic circle rivals to launch a Hong Kong law practice, writes The Asian Lawyer.
Celia Lam, the joint Greater China managing partner for Linklaters, and Christopher Wong, the former head of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer's China corporate practice, will join Simpson Thacher in the autumn.
The hires make Simpson Thacher the latest leading Wall Street law firm to move into local Hong Kong practice after previously only practising US law in the region. Simpson Thacher has had an office in Hong Kong since 1993.
Lam, who formerly headed Linklaters' Beijing arm before becoming co-China head in 2009, is a veteran of several large-scale capital markets and M&A transactions. Last year she advised China Mobile on its $6bn (£3.65bn) acquisition of a 20% stake in Shanghai Pudong Development Bank. She also led Linklaters' representation last spring of the underwriters in the $707m (£431m) Hong Kong initial public offering of French skin care and cosmetics company L'Occitane.
Wong, who also was previously Beijing managing partner for his firm, has a similar practice focus. Last year, he represented Chinese auto dealer Zhongsheng Group on its $370m (£225m) IPO, as well as the underwriters in the $548m (£334m) IPO of Chinese department store and supermarket operator Springland International Holdings.
Simpson Thacher's move into Hong Kong law follows that of several of its New York-based competitors. Davis Polk & Wardwell; Shearman & Sterling; Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy; and Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton all launched Hong Kong law practices last year. Wall Street firms in Hong Kong were previously satisfied to advise companies on either US listings or US law aspects of Hong Kong transactions, letting other firms handle the generally lower-yielding local counsel work.
But the explosive growth of Chinese listings work in Hong Kong, which has led the world in IPOs the last three years, has convinced them to take the plunge into local practice.
Simpson Thacher was slightly slow off the mark. To meet Hong Kong Law Society requirements to practise local law, half of a firm's partners must be Hong Kong-qualified. While partners from Davis Polk, Cleary, and other US firms got ready by taking the once-a-year Hong Kong bar exam in 2009, Simpson partners only took it last autumn.
But Simpson knew right away who it wanted to launch its Hong Kong practice, according to China practice partner Leiming Chen. "We only talked to two people, and those are the people we hired," said Chen. "We were very lucky they saw the same possibilities we did."
The New York firm's choice of recruits illustrates the vulnerability of the major UK firms, which have long dominated Hong Kong capital markets practice, to poaching by their American competitors. Davis Polk hired Freshfields partner Antony Dapiran and Linklaters partner Paul Chow for its Hong Kong team. Cleary hired Norton Rose's China corporate finance head, Freeman Chan, to head its Hong Kong practice.
Simpson Thacher's move also undoubtedly puts pressure on the handful of remaining elite New York firms without Hong Kong practices, most notably Sullivan & Cromwell. Chen, who was himself skeptical of the need for a Hong Kong practice just last year, said that he and the firm changed their minds in part because of the moves by peer firms Davis Polk and Cleary.
The Asian Lawyer is an affiliate title of Legal Week.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCox & Palmer to Merge with Benson Buffett in St. John’s, Canada’s Easternmost City
2 minute readAsia's Top Stories 2024: Departures, Layoffs and Breakups at the Likes of Kirkland, Skadden and Mayer Brown
A&O Shearman’s South African Lawyers in Last-minute Talks To Find Jobs Before Closure
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250