Student research ranks Oxford ahead of Cambridge as top uni law faculty
The University of Oxford has emerged as the top-ranked university law faculty according to a major study of student perceptions carried out by Legal Week's research arm, with the institution ranked 'excellent' by significantly more of its students than its nearest rival, the University of Cambridge. Legal Week Intelligence's 2011 Law Student Report, which surveyed more than 3,700 law students at leading UK universities and Graduate Diploma in Law course providers, found 78% of Oxford students rated its teaching as 'excellent', with Cambridge University placing second, with 69.5%.
June 01, 2011 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
3,700 polled: LW report finds Oxford, Cambridge, UCL best rated
The University of Oxford has emerged as the top-ranked university law faculty according to a major study of student perceptions carried out by Legal Week's research arm, with the institution ranked 'excellent' by significantly more of its students than its nearest rival, the University of Cambridge.
Legal Week Intelligence's 2011 Law Student Report, which surveyed more than 3,700 law students at leading UK universities and Graduate Diploma in Law course providers, found 78% of Oxford students rated its teaching as 'excellent', with Cambridge University placing second, with 69.5%.
The flagship report into students' perceptions of their universities' teaching reveals wide disparities between different institutions with, on average, only 32.6% of students ranking their faculty as 'excellent'.
University College London (UCL) came in third place, with 61% of its law students placing the institution in the top tier.
The trio were the only three institutions to receive a rank of 'excellent' from at least 60% of their students, with Newcastle University the next highest ranked with 55.5%, followed by Durham at 47%.
Below Durham, King's College London and the University of Edinburgh were the only remaining university law departments to come in above the average ranking, but each were ranked 'excellent' by fewer than 35% of students.
University of Oxford law faculty dean Timothy Endicott said: "The difference at Oxford is the high level of attention given to each student, with only 10 students per faculty member, and tutors reading students' essays weekly and discussing their work in tutorials.
"In addition to this, we have also been working on introducing innovative new elements to the course, including compulsory mooting."
UCL law faculty tutor Olga Thomas said: "Our student programmes are designed to convey a broad, multidisciplinary and deep understanding of the law, with a particular emphasis on the global and social context in which law and lawyers operate."
Looking at the rankings by those ranked both 'excellent' or 'very good', Cambridge leads the table, closely followed by Oxford, with Manchester, Durham and King's making up the rest of the top five.
Simmons & Simmons graduate recruitment and development manager Anna King commented: "Oxford and Cambridge have a different tutorial style with much more one-on-one tutor time given, which I can imagine students are very pleased to be offered and benefit from."
- For more details on the research, contact Paul Birk on 0207 316 9864 or email [email protected].
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWickard AI Partners With Law School to Bring Legal AI Training to Ethiopia
What Firms in Australia Are Doing to Attract and Retain Lawyers in a Competitive Market
7 minute readReport: Toronto Law Students Did Not Breach School's Code of Conduct With Pro-Palestinian Letter
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
- 2Jackson Lewis Leaders Discuss Firms Innovator Efforts, From Prompt-a-Thons to Gen AI Pilots
- 3Trump's DOJ Files Lawsuit Seeking to Block $14B Tech Merger
- 4'No Retributive Actions,' Kash Patel Pledges if Confirmed to FBI
- 5Justice Department Sues to Block $14 Billion Juniper Buyout by Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250