DLA Piper scores deal of the day with role on $750m Groupon IPO
DLA Piper and Winston & Strawn are advising on e-commerce site Groupon's initial public offering (IPO), reports The Am Law Daily. The website, popular with customers for its deal-of-the-day discounts, filed for the eagerly anticipated IPO on Thursday (3 June), and is hoping to raise up to $750m (£460m).
June 03, 2011 at 06:40 AM
2 minute read
DLA Piper and Winston & Strawn are advising on e-commerce site Groupon's initial public offering (IPO), reports The Am Law Daily.
The website, popular with customers for its deal-of-the-day discounts, filed for the eagerly anticipated IPO on Thursday (3 June), and is hoping to raise up to $750m (£460m).
Steven Gavin, the chairman of Winston & Strawn's corporate department, is advising Groupon, along with corporate partner Matthew Bergmann.
The firm that has handled the bulk of Groupon's litigation work is DLA Piper. DLA is representing the underwriters the IPO, which include Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley.
Peter Astiz, global co-head of the technology group at DLA in East Palo Alto, is leading a team from the firm that includes corporate securities partners Gregory Gallo and Jason Harmon.
DLA also handles corporate work for Groupon, having advised the company on its acquisition of German startup Citydeal last year.
Groupon, which was founded in November 2008, had $1.3bn (£800m) in sales for the year ending 31 March and first quarter revenue this year of $645m (£396m), according to a filing with the SEC. Groupon has lost $522m (£320m) since its founding.
The news comes alongside four recent partner hires for DLA Piper's US operations.
The firm has recruited two practice group leaders from White & Case in New York – former global tax planning committee chair Gerald Rokoff and former investment funds co-head David Goldstein – as well as ex-Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman IP and technology partners Claudia Wilson Frost and Jeffrey Johnson in Houston.
The Am Law Daily is a US affiliate title of Legal Week.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHong Kong Bourse Seeks Feedback on IPO Price Discovery, Takes Steps to Boost Capital Markets Activity
Hogan Lovells, Khaitan Lead On Beverage Company’s $890M Offering In India
Davis Polk, Simpson Thacher and Japan's Big Four Among Firms Engaged In Japanese Chipmaker’s $4.8B IPO
Can Labour's New Budget Steady the Ship? Big Moves On UK Tax Reform and Fiscal Stability
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Many LA County Law Firms Remain Open, Mobilize to Support Affected Employees Amid Historic Firestorm
- 2Stevens & Lee Names New Delaware Shareholder
- 3U.S. Supreme Court Denies Trump Effort to Halt Sentencing
- 4From CLO to President: Kevin Boon Takes the Helm at Mysten Labs
- 5How Law Schools Fared on California's July 2024 Bar Exam
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250