Bushwhacked - advances by US firms in the City reach an ominous stage
Legal Week's in depth strand has been timely of late. While May's focus on libel and privacy coincided with sustained hysteria about injunctions, this month's international firms in London focus comes as Weil Gotshal & Manges pulls off arguably the most significant City raid yet inflicted on a leading UK law firm. If nothing else, the resignation of a four-partner funds team from Clifford Chance (CC) is evidence that a select band of US law firms is becoming a steadily more menacing threat to the City's finest.
June 15, 2011 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
US advances reach a very threatening point
Legal Week's in depth strand has been timely of late. While May's focus on libel and privacy coincided with sustained hysteria about injunctions, this month's international firms in London focus comes as Weil Gotshal & Manges pulls off arguably the most significant City raid yet inflicted on a leading UK law firm.
If nothing else, the resignation of a four-partner funds team from Clifford Chance (CC) is evidence that a select band of US law firms is becoming a steadily more menacing threat to the City's finest.
This has been particularly evident in private equity. Despite the practice area remaining a shadow of its credit boom self, US firms have returned to predatory recruitment. This is happening for two reasons: clients remain more likely to move with partners than in banking and general M&A, and many US firms have domestic clients looking to do deals in Europe.
Such trends are even more stark in the globalising funds market. A practice area in which five years ago foreign law firms couldn't get their foot in the door in the City is now in danger of being taken over wholesale by US law firms.
Of course, many still wonder why US firms are so fixated on lateral hiring, given its erratic record as a means of successful expansion. In this context, Weil Gotshal is a good example – while some of its partner recruitment has been hugely successful, it has misfired on a number of occasions. And its struggle to branch out its City practice – glaringly in the case of restructuring, but also in acquisition finance and commercial litigation – has been mystifying.
Some have also questioned whether Weil Gotshal needs a UK funds team of this size and whether clients will transfer. Set against that, the firm obviously has a very robust global private equity practice and US funds business (the firm's executive partner, Barry Wolf, is a funds specialist by background and was closely involved in the CC hires) and the firm looks confident of its ground.
With Linklaters banking partner Stephen Lucas and Jones Day restructuring veteran Adam Plainer already recruited this year, Weil Gotshal has certainly made a huge statement to the market about its UK ambitions.
But even leaving aside the prospects for thrusting US invaders, the steady march of foreign firms has major implications for top London firms. Regardless of whether lateral hires deliver at their new home, the loss of City partners in marquee practice areas – as CC has just suffered – can deliver a powerfully symbolic blow. It is one thing to lose individual stars or chunks of your teams, but when firms start losing both to US rivals, questions will inevitably be raised.
And if profits per equity partner is a major part of the brand or share price of top City firms, another important component is the ability to retain key talent. Should the magic circle start regularly failing on that measure, the whole game will change.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDLA Piper, Heuking & Other Key Moves as German Legal Market Reshuffles Ahead of 2025
2 minute readSidley Surges, Linklaters Leaps: The Hires That Made The Headlines in 2024
5 minute readAshurst Beijing Chief Representative Leaves for New York Boutique Sterlington
Trending Stories
- 1Semiconductor Component Maker Accused of Deceiving Investors About Market Downturn, Export Curbs
- 2Zuckerman Spaeder Gets Ready to Move Offices in DC, Deploy AI Tools in 2025
- 3Pardoning Jan. 6 Defendants May Send Bad Message About Insurrection, Rule of Law
- 4Looming Clash Over Abortion Pills Shows Overturning 'Roe v. Wade' Settled Nothing
- 53rd Circuit Strikes Down NLRB’s Monetary Remedies for Fired Starbucks Workers
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250