Social issues: law firm IT directors discuss challenges presented by social media
Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn – there's no escaping the infiltration of social media in the workplace. Legal Week's IT roundtable focused on its use by employees, the data risks involved and how it can be used to a firm's advantage
June 15, 2011 at 07:03 PM
5 minute read
Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn – there's no escaping the infiltration of social media in the workplace. Legal Week's IT roundtable focused on its use by employees, the data risks involved and how it can be used to a firm's advantage
Social media, in all its variant forms, is very much part of everyday life now, and law firms would be best advised to accept that and move on. This was the message delivered by Debra Logan (pictured), senior vice president of research at Gartner, to the Legal Week Intelligence annual roundtable for IT directors held in association with Bytes Technology.
"There is no point in not recognising the extent to which social media is a growing part of people's working lives. If people are working 10 or 12 hours a day you have to expect they will be conducting their social lives at the same time," said Logan.
Some of the chief information officer (CIO) community felt that although use of social media was part of a lawyer's life, they could keep their personal separate from their professional lives. As Paul White from Linklaters pointed out: "Lawyers are using social media but they are able to compartmentalise it and not let it stray into their professional lives. They keep the two very separate."
Internet policy
Generally, every company has a policy document governing employee usage of the internet, a policy which now encompasses use of social media. In the world of financial services, employers often take a dim view of any use at all because of their very risk-averse stance on data security. As Addleshaw Goddard's Peter Thompson pointed out: "A lot of our policy on social media is driven by best practice and the requirements of our financial services clients, many of whom ban social media as a matter of course."
Having a clear communicated policy on social media is one thing, but organising training and explaining the implications of breaching that policy can be a very different thing.
As with a lot of employment issues inside law firms, being able to point to the detailed consequences of a breach of policy is difficult, as any settlement or termination of employment would normally be subject to confidentiality provisions.
Emphasising the theoretical implications of a breach in a training environment also depends on being able to gather together enough people to train.
As Dundas & Wilson's Richard Elson explained: "We recognised that lawyers won't always respond enthusiastically to an invitation to information security training." Dundas has been a bit more creative in its approach to the education process, producing a compulsory e-learning quiz for all staff.
All law firms monitor staff internet usage and recent years has seen a running battle as employees try to push the boundaries of what they can access at what time while CIOs struggle with their bandwidth being dominated by personal internet traffic, both for retail and social media sites.
A lot of law firms still bar the use of Facebook and other related social networking sites – some for the whole day, with some allowing access at lunchtime. Other firms and corporate entities have embraced the technology to such an extent that they are running their own Facebook pages. The issue of policy and enforcement is closely linked to law firms' constant fear of data security.
According to Logan: "There is a problem, obviously, with not owning the data and the data essentially sitting inside a consumer rather than a business environment – on Facebook's server rather than the firm's own server." One potential solution would to outsource the whole process to a specialist provider who would be able to provide a higher level of security than a law firm network.
Once a law firm has embraced social media technology fully, it is possible that it could be used as a business development tool as well as a communication tool.
At least one CIO reported a successful business win as a result of her firm's social media usage. Janet Day at Berwin Leighton Paisner (BLP) said: "Social media is something we are all interested in at BLP. It can, and has already, led to business development opportunities."
———————————————————————————————————————————————–
Attendees
Peter Thompson, Addleshaw Goddard
Gareth Ash, Allen & Overy
Bruna Pellicci, Ashurst
Janet Day, Berwin Leighton Paisner
Lee Hanley, Charles Russell
Alistair Johnson, Clifford Chance
Richard Elson, Dundas & Wilson
Paul White, Linklaters
Andrew Powell, Nabarro
Brian Smith, SJ Berwin
Debra Logan, Gartner Research
Chris Forte, Gartner Research
Jay Babiker, Bytes Technology
Dannii Whinder, Bytes Technology
Paul Birk, Legal Week Intelligence
Des Cahill, Legal Week Intelligence
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCharles Russell Speechlys Gains Traction in Latin America
Trump and China: Lawyers Warn of Risk to the Practice of Law
Big Law Leaders, Dealmakers Optimistic about M&A Deal Flow Under Trump, With Caveats
5 minute readTrump Win Ignites Global Legal Market: Lawyers Prepare for High Demand & Uncertainty
Trending Stories
- 1Passenger Sues Frontier Airlines for Burns Sustained From In-Flight Beverage
- 2Who Are Trump's Potential Candidates for Attorney General?
- 3Drugmaker Wins $70.5M After Fed Judge Says Generic Sales Were Blocked
- 4Out of Thin Scienter: Protecting Confidential Information in Light of ‘NVIDIA v. Ohman’
- 5Federal Prosecutor in Tom Girardi Trial Joins Edelson
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250