Eversheds eyes US presence as firm gears up to go global
Eversheds is considering mergers in both London and the US as part of an ambitious three-year strategy intended to reposition the law firm as a credible global player. The firm's management is consulting with partners and staff about what they want to see in the firm's 2012-15 strategy, but it has highlighted the need to form some kind of presence in the US and a possible merger in the City as priorities.
June 29, 2011 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
US and London mergers mooted in new three-year strategy plan
Eversheds is considering mergers in both London and the US as part of an ambitious three-year strategy intended to reposition the law firm as a credible global player.
The firm's management is consulting with partners and staff about what they want to see in the firm's 2012-15 strategy, but it has highlighted the need to form some kind of presence in the US and a possible merger in the City as priorities.
Partners were told about the proposed strategy at a conference last month, with consultations on the plans due to close in May next year and the final strategy likely to be announced in June 2012.
In addition to looking at the US and strengthening its City presence, Eversheds' management has also identified South America and Russia as major gaps in its geographic spread. The firm initially hoped to open in Russia as part of its 2009-12 strategic plan.
Other key priorities up for debate as part of the three-year plan include improving the firm's client focus and service delivery, as well as looking at whether management structure needs to change as Eversheds becomes more international.
Chief executive Bryan Hughes (pictured) told Legal Week: "We anticipate there will be significant consolidation with the emergence of a relatively small number of true global players. It is Eversheds' inten-tion to be one of these and we must put plans in place now."
He added: "Whenever one is considering global positioning one inevitably has to answer the question: do we need a presence in the US? That is one of the biggest questions we have to consider. As our client base looks to do work across the globe we need to consider whether we need a physical presence of our own in the US, through merger or otherwise, to service our clients' needs."
Eversheds currently relies on a network of best friends firms in the US including Foley & Lardner. One Eversheds partner said: "It's taken two years, but partners have finally come round to the idea that the firm needs to be global and this has to mean some kind of US deal."
Eversheds' last three year plan highlighted Russia, Asia and the Middle East as key areas for growth, with the firm securing launches in Hong Kong and Singapore in 2009 and recently appling for a licence in Beijing.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDentons Australian Chair Doug Stipanicev Back At Work After Investigation
4 minute readMayer Brown’s Hong Kong Split to Take Effect in the Coming Week
Saudi Arabia—Red Tape, Talent Wars & Pricey Office Space Greet Global Law Firms
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New Class Action Points to Fears Over Privacy, Abortions and Fertility
- 2Ex-Big Law Attorney Disbarred for Defrauding $1 Million of Client Money
- 3'New Circumstances': Winston & Strawn Seek Expedited Relief in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
- 4Productivity Suite Startup Macro Announces $12 Million Funding Round
- 5Rudy Giuliani Loses Bid to Dismiss $1.3 Million Davidoff Hutcher & Citron Suit Over Unpaid Legal Fees
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250