Administrators BDO ask ex-Halliwells partners to pay back drawings
A number of former Halliwells partners have been sent letters by the firm's administrators trying to claw back drawings paid out in the months running up to the firm's collapse. Administrators BDO contacted 211 former fixed-share and equity partners last month (23 June), with only 77 of these receiving letters stating that they do not face further action.
July 06, 2011 at 07:03 PM
2 minute read
A number of former Halliwells partners have been sent letters by the firm's administrators trying to claw back drawings paid out in the months running up to the firm's collapse.
Administrators BDO contacted 211 former fixed-share and equity partners last month (23 June), with only 77 of these receiving letters stating that they do not face further action.
Legal Week estimates that at least 90 former equity or fixed-share partners may have been asked to repay drawings paid out in the months leading up to Halliwells' insolvency on 20 July 2010, when the firm was not making a profit.
It is thought the former partners have been asked to repay around £10,000 at the bottom end, with some senior equity partners potentially having to repay a low six-figure sum in overdrawings.
In addition to the letter demanding repayment of overdrawings, other former partners have been told that tax overpaid on their behalf by Halliwells should be recovered for the administrators.
BDO said: "The administrators are now taking steps to recover amounts due to Halliwells LLP from former members. The administrators' solicitors have written to a number of individual former members to seek recovery of sums due to the LLP."
The news comes after Legal Week reported last month that a number of former Halliwells equity partners had been issued with a demand from BDO to repay around £21m related to a controversial 'reverse premium' property payout.
Equity partners distributed the payment, made in 2007 for the sale of a stake in the freehold of its Spinningfields office, among themselves – with the move later being criticised for contributing to the firm's financial problems.
Commenting on the latest developments one former partner said: "These recent letters have come as a bolt out of the blue for many of the fixed-share members, who are now mobilising to fight it and they will also be looking at those people who damaged the firm."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSingapore's Drew & Napier Secures $3.5B Award in Civil Suit
Trending Stories
- 1Critical Mass With Law.com’s Amanda Bronstad: Why Jurors in California Failed to Reach Verdict Over Zantac, Bankruptcy Judge Tables Sanctions Against Beasley Allen Attorney
- 2Jones Day Client Seeks Indemnification for $7.2M Privacy Settlement, Plus Defense Costs
- 3Elections Have Consequences: Some Thoughts on Labor and Employment Law Topics in 2025 and Beyond
- 4Law Firm Associates, Staffers Continue to Put a Premium On Workplace Flexibility, Study Finds
- 52 Carter Arnett Litigators to Join Baker & Hostetler in Dallas
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250