DLA partners in talks over switch to all-equity model
DLA Piper is planning to overhaul its partnership structure, with the firm to consult with partners about options including a shift to an all-equity partnership. The firm plans to discuss overhauling the partnership in DLA Piper International, which includes offices in the UK, Europe, the Middle East and Asia, where it currently operates a three-tier partnership split between a band of equity partners and two tiers of fixed-share partners.
July 13, 2011 at 07:03 PM
2 minute read
DLA Piper considers firmwide partnership structure overhaul
DLA Piper is planning to overhaul its partnership structure, with the firm to consult with partners about options including a shift to an all-equity partnership.
The firm plans to discuss overhauling the partnership in DLA Piper International, which includes offices in the UK, Europe, the Middle East and Asia, where it currently operates a three-tier partnership split between a band of equity partners and two tiers of fixed-share partners.
Partners suggested a consultation could launch as early as September, with one option on the table including asking fixed-share partners to contribute capital in return for equity status.
Any move in this direction would take the international partnership structure closer to its US business, where 275 salaried partners were asked to contribute capital for the first time in late 2008 in return for a direct stake in the firm's profits.
The all-equity partnership consultation, which forms part of DLA's three-year strategic plan running from 2011 to 2014, comes after Legal Week reported in October 2010 that the firm had put plans to move to a one-tier partnership on the back burner.
The firm initially put together a working group in 2009 to look at the issue, planning to make changes by May 2011, but delayed the project, with some partners attributing the delay to higher than anticipated activity levels during the downturn. DLA Piper also appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers to look at issues including aligning partner careers and remuneration.
DLA Piper managing director of groups and services, Andrew Darwin, said: "The intention as outlined by our current three-year strategy is to conduct a review of our partner structure and then make a recommendation to the partnership. We will look at a range of options including having one class of partner."
A partner at the firm said: "The firm is moving in the right direction. It will show that management has trust in its partners and it will give them a greater sense of ownership. The firm will require less external funding and there will be more partners to share the risk."
DLA Piper's three-year strategy also addresses areas including the firm's geographic spread and the services it offers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPogust Goodhead Set to Axe Roles as Accounts Remain Overdue
DLA Piper Takes Greenberg Traurig’s Corporate Partner for Seoul
Cuatrecasas Elevates Seven to Partner in Spain and Latin America
McCarthy Tétrault Welcomes Former CPP Investments Leader to Its Business Law Group
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250