Education without walls - opportunities in the virtual classroom
The new media age has created a generation of law students well versed in digital communication and technologies. A host of social media tools and free-to-use communication platforms have become second nature to the lawyers of tomorrow. As legal practice becomes increasingly globalised and law firms explore the cost-effective and collaborative benefits of virtual technologies, how should legal education keep pace?
July 20, 2011 at 07:03 PM
6 minute read
Jacqueline Kinghan reports on the opportunities in the virtual classroom
The new media age has created a generation of law students well versed in digital communication and technologies. A host of social media tools and free-to-use communication platforms have become second nature to the lawyers of tomorrow. As legal practice becomes increasingly globalised and law firms explore the cost-effective and collaborative benefits of virtual technologies, how should legal education keep pace?
E-learning?
The internet now permeates the law at both a domestic and global level. From courtroom tweets and case comment blogs to e-disclosure software and virtual client negotiations, the use of technology is no longer peripheral but forms an integral part of legal practice. How then can we use new media tools and virtual technology to truly achieve a more worthwhile legal educational experience? And, as lawyers, in accepting this (relatively) new order, how should we contemplate the rules and norms created in the virtual legal learning world?
Of course, there is already an abundance of online lectures, long distance law degrees and vocational courses available to aspiring lawyers. But in thinking of ways to incorporate new technology in teaching, there is still a tendency at higher education establishments to use the term 'e-learning'. In many cases, this reveals a fundamental disconnect between the ultimate aims of education and how new media technology is perceived.
When online tools are so freely available and integrated into the patterns of daily life, their adoption in the educational sphere should not signal a distinct category of learning. Instead, these tools should become a natural extension of what we are already doing.
What is a virtual legal learning world?
Education that is international, real-time and virtual is not beyond reach. For a law student in a globalised world, legal education should ideally facilitate exposure to global perspectives. It should offer skills and experience and allow connection and co-operation with aspiring lawyers around the world. It seems obvious, then, that there are more creative ways to harness the collaborative potential of new media tools than simply delivering an online lecture.
One such example is a pilot project from University College London's (UCL's) faculty of laws called Law Without Walls™ (LWOW), established by pioneering academics at Miami Law School. Other partner universities include Harvard Law School, New York Law School, Peking School of Transnational Law and Fordham Law School. Selected students participate weekly in an online classroom on Adobe Connect where issues are presented by a diverse range of academics and practitioners on cutting edge areas of legal education or practice. These include entrepreneurship potential, new billing structures for law firms, virtual courtrooms and comparative legal education.
It is an exciting, international initiative that embraces interactive teaching and research and a multidisciplinary approach. As Professor Dame Hazel Genn comments: "UCL Laws is keen to promote creativity and innovation through inspiring projects such as this, which enable change and pave the way for a new legal experience."
Collaboration
A unique feature of LWOW is that UK students are paired with students from another global law school and they work together on a research project in an area of legal education or practice. The environment lends itself to delving deep into a challenging allocated problem given that students are transcending physical, international and cultural boundaries. They are each assigned an academic and practitioner mentor (who could be located anywhere globally) to assist them in the research process and meetings with those mentors are conducted on an interactive platform such as Skype or iChat.
This collaborative environment not only challenges the traditional classroom model but the traditional tutor-student relationship. It lends itself to experiential learning, long recognised as an effective teaching method, given the hands-on approach of conducting virtual interviews, communicating on virtual platforms and achieving worthwhile international research on issues of legal and practical importance.
Beyond the virtual classroom
Such an environment clearly has the potential to encourage critical thinking at a global level on issues of international importance. It can widen the opportunities available to a young lawyer by honing employability skills and providing a platform for networking. More than this, it gives students unique exposure to the new rules of working and researching in the virtual world. A whole host of new practical questions can arise: what is acceptable etiquette? How late is too late to click the button and 'enter' a classroom? What body language is appropriate on camera? What is an acceptable discussion or chat thread?
The virtual classroom also requires new levels of multi-tasking. Each presenter might share weblinks, video content, online reports or cases to illustrate their point. All of these have the potential to be posted at the same time as a discussion thread begins and students queue virtually to ask a question, make a comment or share a link to further online material. Plus, unlike a class where people face the front or perhaps even sit in a circle, the video of your classmates and your presenter is directly in front of you.
From class to client
A recent conversation with a partner at a City law firm about the virtual classroom illustrated that similar questions arise in practice. Many City firms use telepresence technology, delivering lifelike face-to-face meetings. In a virtual negotiation, however, you might choose carefully where to sit as being beside rather than opposite an opponent on a negotiation table makes for difficult engagement on points in issue. In court, a barrister who has conducted a video-link hearing knows that the nuances of trying to elicit evidence in this medium are very different.
As courts consider a greater move towards virtual hearings, these issues will become all the more salient. Indeed, we are confronted with the question of what virtual justice looks like and how we as lawyers can be trained and empowered to act in our clients' best interests. A classroom that deals with these issues head on is surely a progressive step towards educating lawyers equipped to deal with the challenges of tomorrow's legal world.
Jacqueline Kinghan is a senior teaching fellow in the faculty of laws at University College London.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Almost Impossible'?: Squire Challenge to Sanctions Spotlights Difficulty of Getting Off Administration's List
4 minute read'Never Been More Dynamic': US Law Firm Leaders Reflect on 2024 and Expectations Next Year
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250