Pinsents faces £10m negligence claim from former client
Pinsent Masons has been hit with a negligence claim of more than £10m from a former client. Construction contractor Shepherd Construction has launched a claim in the High Court alleging that negligent drafting of contracts by Pinsents left the company liable to repay subcontractors when one of its clients went into administration.
August 01, 2011 at 10:18 AM
3 minute read
Pinsent Masons has been hit with a negligence claim of more than £10m from a former client.
Construction contractor Shepherd Construction has launched a claim in the High Court alleging that negligent drafting of contracts by Pinsents left the company liable to repay subcontractors when one of its clients went into administration.
The claim relates to the collapse of a joint venture to build the Trinity Walk shopping centre in Wakefield. Trinity Walk Wakefield, a joint venture between Modus and CIREF, went into administration in 2009 with York-based Shepherd responsible for the construction.
When the joint venture collapsed Shepherd attempted to withhold payment from subcontractors including steel contractor William Hare; however, a judgment in 2009 ruled that it could not withhold payment as the contract did not allow it.
According to a report in Building, Shepherd alleges that a 'pay-when-paid' clause – that was originally drafted by Pinsents in 1998 and had been used repeatedly since – failed to take into account changes brought in by the 2002 Enterprise Act.
Pinsents, which has enlisted West End firm Beale and Company and 4 New Square's David Sears QC to defend it, is fighting the claim on the grounds that the clause was accurate when drafted.
Beale senior partner Antony Smith said: "Pinsent Masons denies all liability as the contract was accurate when drafted."
Andrew Paton, a professional indemnity partner at Pinsent Masons, commented: "We are disappointed that proceedings have been commenced against us by Shepherd Construction. We shall be vigorously defending these allegations in the Technology and Construction Court and have applied to strike-out the claim."
A hearing due to take place tomorrow (2 August) is set to see Pinsents attempt to strike out the claim completely.
Shepherd Construction could not be reached for comment.
News of the claim comes after it emerged last week that Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer is facing a £141.96m negligence claim relating to advice it gave London Underground Ltd (LUL) in 2002.
The claim was issued by LUL in the High Court in January this year and relates to advice the magic circle firm gave the company on its 2003 public-private partnership with collapsed transport company Metronet.
LUL is arguing that Freshfields' advice on contracts drawn up in 2002 meant that following Metronet's administration in 2007 it had to pay out more in associated 'breakage' costs than it should have. A court hearing is not expected until 2012 at the earliest.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKingsley Napley and Lord Pannick Spearhead Private Schools' Challenge to Government VAT Policy
Spain Loses Appeal as London Court Rejects Claim of Immunity in €101 Million Arbitral Award Enforcement
Jones Day Expands European Footprint with Global Disputes Partner in Madrid
ENRC and SFO Reach Shock Settlement Over Media Leaks Allegations
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250