Freshfields and Linklaters mull shake-up of lockstep models
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Linklaters are considering plans to overhaul their partner remuneration structures, with both firms looking at ways to reduce the number of partners at the top of their respective locksteps. Freshfields, which until now has operated a pure lockstep with no powers to move partners up or down the equity, is in the early stages of talks with partners about modifying its system.
August 03, 2011 at 07:03 PM
3 minute read
Arch rivals consider moves to modify strict lockstep models
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Linklaters are considering plans to overhaul their partner remuneration structures, with both firms looking at ways to reduce the number of partners at the top of their respective locksteps.
Freshfields, which until now has operated a pure lockstep with no powers to move partners up or down the equity, is in the early stages of talks with partners about modifying its system.
Partners within the firm have cited the top-heavy balance of the lockstep as an area of concern, with modifications being discussed including giving senior partners the opportunity to take a five or 10-point reduction in their share of the profits in exchange for a reduced working week. This also ties in with plans to promote flexible working at all levels.
The review, which comes as it emerges that Freshfields has also extended the bottom of its 12-year lockstep so that it runs from 17.5 points to 50 across all of its offices, could also see the firm looking at ways to better reward strong performers.
Freshfields' consultation comes as magic circle rival Linklaters holds similar discussions within its own partnership. Incoming senior partner Robert Elliott included a review of partner remuneration as part of his manifesto, with ideas on the table including a US-style tapered lockstep that could result in more senior partners seeing their equity points reduce over time after reaching the plateau.
The firm, which currently operates a pure lockstep running from 10-25 points, has yet to issue proposals to the partnership, but other ideas suggested by partners include creating different equity ladders for different regional offices. Such a move would reverse the firm's drive in recent years to create an all-equity partnership that is aligned across all offices.
One Freshfields partner said: "These will only be minor adjustments to the top and bottom of the lockstep. Even the most conservative of firms need to adjust to the market, and in order to be able to compete with more progressive US firms, changes need to happen."
A Linklaters partner added: "A modified system where partners would move down slightly after reaching the plateau would erase the stigma and increase flexibility in terms of remuneration."
Linklaters declined to comment. Freshfields refused to confirm the review. A spokesperson stated: "We are, and plan to remain, a lockstep firm."
For more analysis, see Lockstep 2.0 – time to upgrade a trusty model.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSingapore Litigators Shift Competitive Landscape as Another Senior Duo Sets Up Own Shop
US Judge Allows $8M Unpaid Legal Fees Lawsuit Against Sierra Leone to Proceed
2 minute readLondon Trial Against BHP Alleges ‘Red Flags’ Leading up to Brazil Mining Disaster Were Ignored
Trending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250