Google legal chief hits out at rivals over 'bogus' patent claims
Google's chief legal officer David Drummond has hit out at Apple, Microsoft and Oracle for pursuing "bogus" patent claims, reports Corporate Counsel. In an Google blog post entitled 'When patents attack Android', Drummond writes that the success of Android, Google's smartphone operating system, has prompted rivals Microsoft and Apple "to get into bed together" to purchase smartphone patents and has inspired a "hostile, organised campaign against Android by Microsoft, Oracle, Apple and other companies, waged through bogus patents."
August 05, 2011 at 11:07 AM
2 minute read
Google's chief legal officer David Drummond has hit out at Apple, Microsoft and Oracle for pursuing "bogus" patent claims, reports Corporate Counsel.
In an Google blog post entitled 'When patents attack Android', Drummond writes that the success of Android, Google's smartphone operating system, has prompted rivals Microsoft and Apple "to get into bed together" to purchase smartphone patents and has inspired a "hostile, organised campaign against Android by Microsoft, Oracle, Apple and other companies, waged through bogus patents."
Drummond's comments come after a consortium including Apple, Microsoft and Sony Ericsson last month outbid Google to purchase 6,000 strategic Nortel Networks patents for $4.5bn (£2.8bn), while late last year a group including Microsoft, Oracle and Apple acquired 882 patents from software company Novell.
Drummond (pictured) also alleges that Google's rivals have banded together to acquire large collections of patents in order "to make sure Google didn't get them," to make Android more expensive, and therefore "make it harder for manufacturers to sell Android devices." The strategy is "anti-competitive" and a "weapon" against innovation, Drummond writes.
In response to the blog, Microsoft's general counsel Brad Smith tweeted: "Google says we bought Novell patents to keep them from Google. Really? We asked them to bid jointly with us. They said no."
This was followed by a further tweet from Frank Shaw, head of corporate communications for Microsoft, linking to a corroborating email from Google general counsel Kent Walker to Brad Smith, declining to join Microsoft in the Novell bid. The email reads:
"After talking with people here, it sounds as though for various reasons a joint bid wouldn't be advisable for us on this one. But I appreciate your flagging it, and we're open to discussing other similar opportunities in the future."
Last month's competitive auction for the Nortel patents saw Herbert Smith take a lead role for Ernst & Young, the administrator to Nortel's EMEA entities, while US firm Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton acted for Nortel's US arm.
Corporate Counsel is a US affiliate title of Legal Week.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBroadcom Hires From Nuclear Giant to Appoint French Legal Head
GCs Say They are Getting 'Edged Out' of UK Boardrooms
'I Won’t Name the Firm, But...'—Barratt Redrow's Legal Head on External Counsel Red Flags
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250